This question is probably the most important aspect right now, since the entire premise of the impeachment is that Trump Incited this, by lying about the Election fraud.
Their entire Fake Impeachment scam claim, ad nauseam, is that the "Stop the Steal" rhetoric was the driving force. Not the fact that WE ALL KNOW DAMN WELL THEY STOLE IT.
With all eyes on this BS trial, and the fact that no matter what Team Trump says, they completely ignore it. So, maybe they can't be TOLD, it has to be SHOWN?
Quads confirm Shenanigans.
Lets hope that today, they DROP Intel to Unite us.
Interesting the kill box has the i.
INDICTMENT?
3 yr Delta
Ratskin desperately trying to alter the charges to now include what happened DURRING the fake Insurrection.
IRRELEVANT TO THE CHARGE.
1 Charge.
Ratskin wants to play an Avenetti type Build the case as you go shit. NOPE.
You're not allowed to ask for clarification on what you just voted for.
Just shut up and vote for deception
Whose to say that by allowing witnesses, the D's play by the rules and allow Team Trump to call them?
The whole wrists crossed by Trump lawyer seems to imply, they will deny his requests for his witnesses.
Q 55
Look to Twitter:
Exactly this: "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us……."
God bless.
Q45
Follow Huma.
What just broke w/ Huma?
What did HRC instruct Huma to do re: Classified markings?
Why is this story just now coming out?
What relevance does it have?
Why is Donna running for cover?
Was a deal granted in exchange for something?
Who made the deal?
Do we care about Donna or those who instructed her to violate the law?
Why is this being leaked v. simply prosecuted privately?
Who is attempting to change the narrative and soften the acts that are forthcoming this weekend?