Anonymous ID: 068ce4 Feb. 13, 2021, 4:49 p.m. No.12919141   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9314 >>9467 >>9523 >>9581 >>9663 >>9719

Louisiana GOP Executive Committee Votes Unanimously to Censure Senator Bill Cassidy Over Sham Impeachment Vote

 

Earlier today Senator Bill Cassidy joined six Republican senators to vote to impeach President Donald Trump.

 

Following the vote the Louisiana Republican Executive Committee unanimously voted to censure Senator Bill Cassidy.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/louisiana-gop-executive-committee-votes-unanimously-censure-senator-bill-cassidy-sham-impeachment-vote/

Anonymous ID: 068ce4 Feb. 13, 2021, 4:54 p.m. No.12919202   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9314 >>9467 >>9581 >>9663 >>9719

Three 300,000 Biden Vote Dumps Late on Election Night in Virginia Cannot Be Adequately Explained or Tied to Final Results

 

There’s something not right with the 2020 Election results in Virginia. There were three massive vote dumps of more than 300,000 Biden votes late on Election night that are being ignored by politicians and the media.

 

We reported previously on the 2020 election results for President in Virginia. Hundreds of thousands of votes for Joe Biden were reported in massive vote dumps in the middle of the night and yesterday we discovered this all took place in Fairfax County. A response from Delegate Chris Head to a constituent attempted to answer questions related to these ballot dumps but failed miserably:

 

The delegate’s response brushed by the fact that massive dumps of Biden votes at 90/10 and 80/20 Biden to Trump were dropped in the middle of the night.

 

After rambling on about the vote drop the delegate then noted that the Edison data doesn’t matter anyway it’s the official state results that matter that can be found here.

 

We looked at this site and we found that the results on the site don’t agree with the results on the Edison feed. The Edison feed is the official results from the election provided to the media on the night of the election. We reported in November on these results using the New York Times/Edison data feed from Election night.

 

The Virginia delegate provided Edison data for Fairfax County only, which were the bulk of the entries posted late on Election Night. Next, we looked at the ‘official results’ at the link provided by the representative. Unfortunately, we were unable to tie these results to the Edison data provided by the representative for Fairfax County. Why are the data and results not transparent?

 

The following results are divided by US Congressional District:

 

Congressional District 11 includes Fairfax City and Fairfax County and Prince William County. The total number of votes for Biden is 281,000 votes with 61,000 from Prince William County:

 

Another entry for Fairfax County was located in Congressional District 10, where Fairfax County shows with 77,000 votes for Biden.

 

The more we look into the results from the 2020 election the more questions we have. Why is no one else looking into this especially politicians who we voted in to preserve the US Constitution?

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/exclusive-three-300000-biden-vote-dumps-late-election-night-virginia-cannot-adequately-explained-tied-final-results/

Anonymous ID: 068ce4 Feb. 13, 2021, 4:58 p.m. No.12919250   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Everyone in the US Criminal Justice System has a Motive

 

I think it is human nature. As Dale Carnegie said, “A person’s toothache means more to that person than a famine in China which kills a million people. A boil on one’s neck interests one more than forty earthquakes in Africa.”

 

And I would add further, a conviction for a prosecutor, for example, means more to that person than whether 50 innocent people languish in prison.

 

Everyone has a motive, and that motive is self-interest. In positions of power, there ought to be checks and balances for this reason alone. Of course, not all prosecutors are corrupt, they are not all sociopaths. But the motive for them to convict after they indict, and the motive to indict after they spend time investigating a target, and the motive to find targets to investigate to keep up their road to advancement – conviction stats – is so high that even average prosecutors will be influenced by a confirmation bias that will help them be blind to innocence.

 

The indictment of innocents for a prosecutor is the most unpleasant, uncomfortable feeling in the world for that prosecutor. He or she will either have to admit they are wrong, that they are, in effect, incompetent, that their office is reckless, in short, a stain on their entire career, or they have to save themselves, save their reputation and overlook. With dishonest prosecutors, they will knowingly try to convict an innocent defendant. For the mediocre prosecutor, he or she will merely put on blinders and see only their theories of guilt, ignoring evidence of innocence, and permitting themselves to lie to themselves and say that the jury will make the decision so it is not incumbent upon them to make the final determination of guilt or innocence. So, should an innocent defendant or two or three or a hundred in the course of one’s career, go to prison, it was the jury who spoke.

 

https://frankreport.com/2021/02/12/erasend-everyone-in-the-us-criminal-justice-system-has-a-motive/

Anonymous ID: 068ce4 Feb. 13, 2021, 5:05 p.m. No.12919316   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9341 >>9357 >>9467 >>9581 >>9663 >>9719

School closures, masks until 2022: Biden campaign promises appear increasingly in doubt

 

U.S. is still "in the teeth of this pandemic," president says.

 

 

President Joe Biden's administration appears to be subtly backing off several key COVID promises Biden made while on the campaign trail, potentially suggesting a re-alignment of strategy amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

 

Biden in December vowed that, assuming "strong public health measures" were in place, his administration would "work to see that the majority of our schools can be open by the end of my first 100 days."

 

Yet guidance released this week offered a more tempered version of that bold pledge. The CDC's reopening guidelines stipulate that schools in areas of high COVID transmission should consider switching to "virtual only instruction" unless administrators in those areas "can strictly implement all mitigation strategies," including physical distancing requirements and "universal and correct use of masks."

 

The logistics of ensuring hundreds of students constantly obey hardline mask rules while remaining six feet apart at all times could prove too difficult for many schools. As CNN noted this week, nearly 100% of U.S. students are in high "red zone" transmission areas under those guidelines.

 

Further indicating a re-assessment of executive COVID ambitions, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki this week claimed that Biden's "goal" is for "the majority of schools, so more than 50 percent, open by day 100 of his presidency."

 

Psaki clarified that she was defining an "open" school as "at least one day a week," though she conceded: "Hopefully it’s more."

 

Elsewhere Biden has suggested that the U.S. may continue wearing face masks much longer than he initially proposed. On the campaign trail Biden pledged to "ask" Americans to wear face masks for the first 100 days of his presidency, something he claimed could help bring the pandemic under control.

 

Data indicate that nine out of 10 Americans already regularly wear masks, but Biden numerous times stressed the importance of his voluntary mask proposal.

 

Yet this week he indicated that masking requirements may continue for much longer. Speaking to reporters at the National Institutes of Health, Biden refused to remove his mask even though he was standing about 10 feet away from the press, nearly double the standard "social distancing" recommendation.

 

“You know that wearing this mask through the next year here can save lives — a significant number of lives,” Biden told the press.

 

Whether that signals a shift in the Biden administration's masking priorities is unclear. Biden himself, after promising to address the COVID pandemic over the course of his presidential campaign, last month appeared to sharply diverge from his earlier confidence on the issue, suggesting there was nothing he or his administration could do to counteract the virus in the near future.

 

"There's nothing we can do to change the trajectory of the pandemic in the next several months," he said during a White House speech.

 

https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/school-closures-masks-until-2022-biden-campaign-promises-appear-increasingly

Anonymous ID: 068ce4 Feb. 13, 2021, 5:13 p.m. No.12919382   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9428 >>9467 >>9581 >>9663 >>9719

Aust MSM

 

South China Sea tensions at boiling point as Beijing tells Coast Guard to shoot, Philippines reacts

 

China has made a “threat of war” over its arbitrary borders in the South China Sea. Beijing said it will “take all necessary measures” in the conflict.

 

The South China Sea is reaching boiling point. Beijing has told its Coast Guard to shoot at any vessel inside its arbitrarily declared ‘nine-dash line’ borders. Now the Philippines says its navy will shoot back.

 

Philippines Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr this week vowed any response would bring serious consequences.

 

“So far there has been no incident. If there is an incident, I can assure you there will be more than just a protest,” Mr Locsin told local media.

 

He was commenting after issuing a formal diplomatic protest against what he called a “verbal threat of war”.

 

“Initially I said, you make a law, a domestic law that’s nobody’s business, however, on reflection, you realise that this law can be applied to areas that they claim are theirs … they will fire if there’s resistance. That to me is a threat of war,” he said.

 

Japan is also bracing for an escalation of conflict around its islands in the East China Sea.

 

Beijing wants them. It regularly sends its fishing militia and coast guard into their exclusive economic zone.

 

Japan’s Defence Ministry says Beijing’s “open fire” law “could shake the order based on international law”.

 

FIGHTING WORDS

 

Beijing’s embassy in Manila has attempted to deflect criticism and concern.

 

But the law speaks for itself. It orders China’s navy and coast guard to “take all necessary measures, including the use of weapons when national sovereignty, sovereign rights, and jurisdiction are being illegally infringed upon by foreign organisations or individuals at sea”.

 

The Manila embassy says the law isn’t aimed at any one country. It says it conforms to international conventions.

 

“Many countries have enacted similar legislation. The Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) Law of 2009 established the PCG as an armed and uniformed service. None of these laws has been seen as a threat of war,” an embassy statement reads.

 

South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines disagree.

 

https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/military/south-china-sea-tensions-at-boiling-point-as-beijing-tells-coast-guard-to-shoot-philippines-reacts/news-story/d63d1c6e51eed9243382e9d2ff216f15