(last repost) When normies google "qanon" - wikipedia is in top results. I don't like Wikipedia myself, but I think it's part of the battlefront for waking up normies.

Anons who know Wikipedia, know how to contribute properly there, edit, protect edits, don't spam them or post shit that gets the page moderated, etc… I urge you to consider a campaign to publish normie-friendly Qanon information there, and maintain it ongoing during the length of this storm - and beyond.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon

There is a "Story of Q" being worked on in other thread. I don't understand all the wacademic nonsense Wikipedia "enforces" on pages there… but it CAN be done - right?

If we are going to ask "Do You Know About Q?" - we better have some places for those people to land, besides here.

>>1292363

Thank you for the fact check. How did you find so fast? Reverse image search? ((they)) are attempting to poison Ben's good works, looks like…

>>1292682

These kinds of stampers are easy to order online at places like Vistaprint. Usually less than $20 for a custom message on self inking stamper.

>>1292793

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/ClueBot_NG

"Cluebot-NG is an attempt to revolutionize practical vandalism prevention on Wikipedia. Existing anti-vandal bots use simple static heuristics, and as such, catch a relatively small portion of vandalism, and with an unacceptable false positive rate, many of which are likely not even reported. Cluebot-NG shares no code with the original Cluebot, and uses completely different algorithms to detect vandalism. Details of these algorithms can be found at [1] . Because these algorithms must be trained on a dataset, there is also a convenient way to estimate accuracy before a live run - simply running the bot on a portion of its dataset not used for training. Currently, this is yielding a 60% to 70% vandalism detection rate - far above that of current bots."