And he didn't say stars create it - he labelled them transformers.
All stars are fed by their galactic circuits, which are in turn fed by their local supercluster and who knows what beyond that scale.
Stars are transformers of electrical energy, and in doing so also induce the condensinging of more energitic feed, into 'ionised' matter.
As above, so below.
These sub-atomic particles don't exist.
The 'proton' is the fundamental particle and anything observed below this as the result of a collision is an illusion garnered from a collision artefact/exit path, which if you repeat often enough (billions/trillions) you can find any pattern or prejudice you enter the experiemnt with.
No such t'thing' as a Neutron. It's simply a proton spinning in reverse, forced by proximity to a proton (it has to counter rotate - it can eb not other way). This is why all neutrons 'transform' into protons a matter of miutes after release from an atomic nuclues.
Electrons do NOT exist.
What is perceived is the constructive interference of the dielectric/magnetic expression of the nucleus. This decays over the lifetime of the nucleus, and has a direct an inverse relationship to the 'speed of light' (a misnomer in itself).
So. Fucking. Much. that the quantum idiots have mislead science from over the past century.
Time to back out of the cul-de-sac.
Oh, so you think I am trying to convert you?
Silly.
A statement of facts. If you don't accept, fine. Others know how to discern fact from fiction here…