dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

What's up with Solar Cycle 25? Why is the data being suppressed?

As everyone should already know, the one major thing that is wrong with every single climate "model" is that, by their own admission, the scientists ignore the largest driver of earth temperature, ie the sun.

Which is weird, right? I mean logically speaking, planets closer to the sun are warmer, and get progressively cooler the farther away, so we can conclude that the sun's effects on planetary temperature exists.

In addition, the sun is a variable star, with it's energy output varying about 4% in 11 year cycles. We are currently in the beginning of the 25th cycle that scientists have tracked. They use the number of sunspots appearing on the sun as a proxy of how energetic ie how hot the sun is. The more the spots, the hotter it is.

Yet, again, ALL climate models ignore the sun and it's effects on the planet. BONUS Knowledge: Did you know that the old farmer's almanac uses the sunspot number to predict the weather one year out? Ben Franklin knew this basic science!

Anyway, the government predicts the strength of the cycle, and publishes updates. Cycle 24 was tracked quite extensively and we saw that it was the least energetic cycle in a 100 years. Cycle 25, however, isn't being predicted by the gov. At least I cannot find the prediction in chart format, only a vague, whelp it's going to be below average and about what cycle 24 was…….

Here is the government's site that used to have to prediction charts and now it's just a blurb.

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/news/solar-prediction-scientists-announce-solar-cycle-25