Anonymous ID: b884bc Feb. 14, 2021, 4:30 a.m. No.12923150   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3159 >>3187

>>12923031

Small chance of that when men have become so pussified.

Unless men return to their rightful position of protectors and providers of/for women and children, women will continue to splat their emotionalism all over the place instead of confining it to where it belongs - nurturing a family - or cats for the old maids.

Anonymous ID: b884bc Feb. 14, 2021, 4:39 a.m. No.12923178   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3192 >>3200

>>12923152

Totally agree, especially re the inability for abstract thought which undergirds mathematics, the foundation of all worthwhile, creative endeavours.

When a society becomes image-based instead of word-based it reverts to infancy. Why do you think we start children off on the reading journey with PICTURE books? Children are meant to progress from pictures to words but it's not happening in our present, omfantilised, image-based world. By design, I have no doubt.

Anonymous ID: b884bc Feb. 14, 2021, 4:46 a.m. No.12923209   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3242

>>12923193

>EMP is the only way.

Strange you should say this. I was only just thinking that reversion to a pre-electricity society might be the only way to recover our human potential and return us to a right path. The path we're on leads only to degeneracy, destruction and death.

Anonymous ID: b884bc Feb. 14, 2021, 4:53 a.m. No.12923240   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3263

>>12923200

It's not about NO imagery, it's about how much. Pictures tend to deny abstract thought to the viewer as they are the condensed output of another's thinking.

If children never progress from picture-BASED communication to word-BASED communication, they will remain susceptible to the ideas of others transmitted though imagery, as they will not have developed the ability to THINK for themselves.