Anonymous ID: 248b12 Jan. 22, 2018, 5:15 p.m. No.129979   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0053 >>0062 >>0115

>>129426

OK anons….hold on to your hats.

 

I was one of the planefags tracking that last night. I was mapping it's flight path on Google maps to measure the distance it flew.

 

One planefag tracked the transponder code to an E-6B Mercury. This is the 'doomsday' plane as some have called it. Navy jet that took the place of the old Looking Glass aircraft when it retired in the 90s.

 

Anyway, I completely missed the shape. BUT….and here's the next puzzle piece. That aircraft, drone or regular aircraft, flew 3000nm.

 

3000

 

What did Q say about how many children were saved in the SA ops?

 

3000

 

Now we need to look at those cities where major turn points were made as possible locations of busts or something similar.

 

Sorry for not picking up on it last night. Catching up now just getting in from work and saw the previous bread on Op Pelican.

 

Something told me trolling was going on! Nicely done!

Anonymous ID: 248b12 Jan. 22, 2018, 5:44 p.m. No.130145   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0168

>>130062

Don't know exactly but maybe those 3000 children who were rescued are now safely in the US. Perhaps even relocated to the major cities and states where the aircraft flew. Just guessing at this point.

Anonymous ID: 248b12 Jan. 22, 2018, 5:51 p.m. No.130192   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>130115

Forgot to mention in my previous post. The reason they were maintaining constant altitude and airspeed is because of the range they were flying. 3000nm is a LONG way for that airframe, if it was an E-6B.

 

As for those saying it had to be a drone because a pilot couldn't account for winds, etc. don't know what they're talking about. Pilots ALWAYS account for wind and if a pilot can't maintain altitude, heading and airspeed they have no business being a pilot.