>>129174

>After the latest leaks it seems it was "Ad hoc" decision. And that's why the "cock ups" as excused by the BCC?)

I wrote that wrong.

"it" refers to the stories around the Salomon Bros. bld. aka "Bld. 7" / ada Lehman bros. Bld. and the decision taken that it should be destroyed.

When the mission as conceived failed, that's when they decided they had to destroy "7" building via demolition?

It was Guil. security bunker just built. And all offices in Bld. leased to FEDS.

Some claim Giuliani was meant to die that day to provide an excuse for martial law? Maybe. Maybe not.

I don't know their complete plans so I don't know what-all was foiled.

I wrote "BCC" but that is BBC.. Jane Standley announcing the destruction of "7" while it was still there on the live screen behind her - They pulled the plug on her interview minutes before "7" came down.

That was the "Cock-up" as described by BBC chief.

Another example of "OOPs we have no tapes from that day" [and that day alone of any other day]

>>129599

>And all offices in Bld. leased to FEDS.

Or maybe some to local government? dunno.

But they were all government related/ government leases.

Here 's the fire in 7?

The officials stuck to their lie. But put off the report forever. Never admitted it was "pulled" though they could've easily just said ""Silverstein assented to its destruction after an assessment by Fire Dept" ?

Or did they like that as a frikkn Red Herring?

So all the 9/11 "truthers" chant "Bld 7" every year and no one knows what they are talking about or even why it would matter?

I go with the "red herring" theory.

"7" is not the best evidence for fraud.

It's actually the worst evidence?

To my mind, anyway.

"The officials stuck to their lie. But put off the report forever. Never admitted it was "pulled" though they could've easily just said ""Silverstein assented to its destruction after an assessment by Fire Dept" ?"

I guess they just thought it would turn to dust, as the Towers did, and decided they would "beat it to the punch"

another theory, It collapsed from grief over losing the Towers. A self - descried architect, back in the day, claimed "7" collapsed from too much dust on it's roof.

Next they'll be saying that condensation trails are chemical?!

Here's the airplane part that was planted and which didn't match what would've been on the alleged commercial airliner.

>>129779

I was told by someone who worked in the Fed Admin at that time in Property resources that the whole bld was government. FWIW

yes, likely the fires were all out by the time they pulled it.

>>129616

It's all the same building. Different names for the same building.

Salomon Bros

Lehman Bros.

Bld. 7

refers to the same object.

Is there something I'm missing?

>>129791

Maybe, and then the vids of it's standard looking demolitions was planted?

I'm very open to that.

https:// hooktube.com/watch?v=bWorDrTC0Qg

On the other hand I've closely examined a witness who watched it come down, like an ordinary demolition.

I don't believe Dr. Wood is correct in every detail . I never heard her claim "7" was destroyed by an exotic weapon.

I will have to look deeper. I'll check her book.

Also we've moved on from the "directed energy" theory. And Dr. Wood never provided evidence for such a weapon.

She goes into what she knows and shows evidence but stays away from speculation. Which is commendable.

.. Her book points to Directed Energy and the Hutchinson effect, but nothing conclusive is advanced. She's very careful about that. .

FWIW

>>129975

They didn't officially find asbestos right away since it was all nano-particles.

It was also giving off something for at least 4 years. No hot though. De-molecularizing. something like that.

Not technically fumes, per Dr. Judy Wood who's field is material forensic science.

Yep [shudder]

And lots of weird blood cancers showed up clustered in "first responder" groups and people dying of unusual diseases. And many rescue dogs dying right away.