Anonymous ID: c16ed5 May 3, 2018, 9:35 p.m. No.1293187   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3205

>>1293065

but… muh concern :(

 

>>1293083

top kek

How's that for a thumb in their eye(s)?

troll level: TRUMP

 

>>1293088

Owls have long been associated with reading and books and learned people. I can't wait to see Lowly Worm on a panel in a library somewhere. He isn't evil either.

 

>>1293118

Thank you. Our ancient symbols were taken and co-opted by sickos. Owls, bees, butterflies, rainbows, certain numbers, colors or letters are not inherently bad/evil. And just because bad people have used them does not make them (the objects/animals/etc) bad.

We need to take them back. Reclaim them.

 

>>1293087

???

Can you rephrase that?

Anonymous ID: c16ed5 May 3, 2018, 10:04 p.m. No.1293373   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3445 >>3461

>>1293313

True. Blend of plausible deniability and chaotic research/propaganda factory with an amazing and mystifying social reach. Yes, some drops/stringers/codes are not for us but others watching, some friendly, some not. Some obviously so, some not. Drawing on the background knowledge of a bunch of "radicalized" (well-read, non-pc) autists of varying degrees along the spectrum, channeling that energy and pent up anger at an overwhelmingly unjust and warped system in service to patriotism for America first, and out sister nations (then the rest of the world) is pure genius.

Very stable genius.

 

Paid shilling, raids, cl0wnbots, trolls and shitposters may distract and annoy us for a while but none of the really understand - while there will be a few pushing back, engaging them head on, the rest of us will be working in the background. WORKING. Working on their demise, the end and ruin of their plans, all their hopes and dreams. What are we doing? This amorphous mass of anonymous supposedly basement-dwelling dweebs? We are building the case, making the graphics to blow their entire operation, destroy their last shred of credibility, dignity, strip them of their precious titles and positions with cunning dot-connecting, merciless wit and lots of piss and vinegar.

 

Very stable genius + weaponized autism = victory

Anonymous ID: c16ed5 May 3, 2018, 10:13 p.m. No.1293414   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3444 >>3460

>>1293366

>Almost looks like there isn't an engine on the port side - just the mount.

How could it legitimately fly like that? I don't know much, but that doesnt' seem like that would work.

Training? Maybe, could be. But why would Q show us that photo with the others?

 

>>1293396

So to clarify, you are saying that the pic that Q posted (the plane in question ) is totally normal, no different from the one you just posted? If that is the case, the suggestion to look closer at the undercarriage? Misdirection? Distraction?

Just trying to follow along…

Anonymous ID: c16ed5 May 3, 2018, 10:30 p.m. No.1293498   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3520 >>3556

>>1293444

>>1293460

Ok, thank you both.

 

>>1293418

(((Turks)))

 

>>1293423

Why? Information warfare (gathering, disseminating). Psychological warfare (discerning, applying what's learned, affecting it outwards).

Q in the card or not, I don't see why it would implicate a negative connotation to here or our project?

 

>>1293455

I doubt that. It would violate his NS clearance, and he doesn't seem the type to do something reckless like that.

Anonymous ID: c16ed5 May 3, 2018, 10:46 p.m. No.1293568   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1293520

Much more plausible set of circumstances.

 

>>1293495

So thoroughly unsurprised by that move.

 

>>1293556

Far more likely is that (((they))) have been led to believe they were in control while patriots in various countries in govt/military/private sector/orgs worked together and laid landmines. The cumulative effect of tripping these well-placed landmines are now becoming obvious in the form of realizing that their control was illusory. Too late to switch to or formulate a plan B

>they never thought she would lose

their only play is to increase the timetable and get rid of as many witnesses as possible.

That's not working out very well is it?

 

>Patriots are in control

>Enjoy the show

Anonymous ID: c16ed5 May 3, 2018, 10:57 p.m. No.1293609   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3617 >>3621 >>3748

>>1293605

>That's how POTUS is gonna give NSA collected data "legally" to the special counsel

But he would have to account for how HE got that info. If it is obviously from wiretapping or other eavesdropping that only /ourguys/ have capability to pull off, how can he explain how he has it?

Anonymous ID: c16ed5 May 3, 2018, 11:13 p.m. No.1293661   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3689 >>3696

>>1293640

/ourguys/ can tap anyone they want, but making the results of that as legally presentable in court requires a lot more than just leaking or "anonymous" sources. This what I'm trying to get to.

POTUS given dirt on badguys by /ourguys/

POTUS questioned/interviewed by SC

POTUS cannot turn over wiretap info because although he may be privy to it per his position, if illegally obtained would be inadmissible in court.

So SC wouldn't be able to use that info to get badguys…

 

>>1293640

FISA court is for foreign matters, but still you can't use illegally obtained info in court.

"Fruit of the poisoned tree" doctrine in law

 

There is a plan to get this information 'out there' legally before the court by /ourguys/ I just don't know what it is