>>1294445

I think when Q said 'we went too deep'

is what you're starting to do.

That's cool anons dig dig but it's too deep for most

>>1294473

yeah kinda makes sense.

looking into your personal blindness is where it's going too deep….. most faganons only want to deal with realities that we allish agreeish as objectiveish. but metaphysical et powers etc don't rub too well cuz they are limited to very small%

I making sense?

>>1294510

my suspicion is that the too deep was the merkel hitler conection. We aren't ready to go as far as someone like miles M has yet….. in fact it's probly the thing that would put 90% of normies in the looneybin

>>1294522

yeah yeah ok

but

before 'Big Pharma, EMF pollution, chemtrailing, Deweyesque education, etc.' ie just my parent and grandparent gens had no 'powers'. in fact it seemed that only cayce was close in harnessing anything, so our birthright powers?? they can be explored but aren't reality for most

>>1294530

yeah as if he would want such a sullied named prize..

the oscars gave one to the white helmets too and right royally fucked whatever dignity they might have had left.

no actors after the great awakening will want a cabal owned puppet award

and no president should want a cabal owned award