When normies google "qanon" - wikipedia is in top results. I don't like Wikipedia myself, but I think it's part of the battlefront for waking up normies.

Anons who know Wikipedia, know how to contribute properly there, edit, protect edits, don't spam them or post shit that gets the page moderated, etc… I urge you to consider a campaign to publish normie-friendly Qanon information there, and maintain it ongoing during the length of this storm - and beyond.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon

There is a "Story of Q" being worked on in other thread. I don't understand all the wacademic nonsense Wikipedia "enforces" on pages there… but it CAN be done - right?

If we are going to ask "Do You Know About Q?" - we better have some places for those people to land, besides here.

>>1295585

That's great - thank you.

Maybe the best of these "qwikis" can be used as references on Wikipedia, bringing people deeper into the light.

Wikipedia isn't the best wiki for us to store vast q data - but it IS a great source of TRAFFIC from the public interested in Q. (Search google - like a normie - for "Qanon" - and see what I mean).

I don't do well with Wikipedia - they don't "like" me there. It has it's own "culture" and adding references and making edits is best done by those with a solid working knowledge and known history of good edits on Wikipedia…if done wrong, and over-done, they will lock the page down making it very hard to change.

Surely some of our anons have this kind of street cred wit Wikipedia…

I hope one or two get the message, or spontaneously have the idea themselves.