I agree.
It does exist.
Simple logic can deduce it.
The natural spin of the electron is what gives a particle mass.
If you counteract the natural spin of the electron via electromagnetism you essentially cancel out the natural spin.
You cancel out the spin you negate mass.
Electron buoyancy
No, what I am saying is atoms must have electrons.. the only time they do not is when they are completely ionized and when they are they are in an unstable state and attract electrons..
They only place where atoms are consistently ionized is the sun..
I'm not doing a great job at explaining plus it has nothing to do with Q so i'm gonna dig on other things.
In short, yet..
But like this anon said >>1297250 it gets into quantum mechanics.
Also, there is reason/evidence supporting the idea that our theory of gravity is incomplete.
The physics that is open and out there right now does not allow for the type of "resolution" needed to fully discuss and implement anti-gravity/augmenting light/teleporation and time augmentation.
The tech is there. The science is there.
My grandfather worked on a Skunkworks project that utilized inertia from gyroscopes for propulsion in pace like 30-40 years ago.
A gyroscope and the inertia it creates, what main stream science calls faux gravity, is a large scale example of what electrons do to other particles.
If you can create propulsion from inertia in space 40 years ago on a large clunky scale, gyroscope, imagine what they can do now on the small particle level and even the quantum level now.
Imagine the increase in efficiency you could achieve by using graphene and graphene nano-tubes instead of copper.
Electrons move across graphene at 99.999999% the speed of light.
If you create a toroid out of graphene nanotubes and run electricity through it at the speed of light opposite the natural spin of electrons..
What sort of result would you get?
Invisibility, anti-"gravity", time augmentation?
True, this has been the case, however graphene changes all of that.
The race to mass produce started in 2012.
I was in shenzhen and toured a government funded graphene manufacturing plant for 3d printing and "other" uses.
MIT just announced their breakthrough system to mass produce it.
Carbon is a wonderful element. 666
Easily.
I already have the process mapped out from extraction, concentration, and dispersal into either 3d printable filament or other dispersal methods.
First phase would cost $5-$10 million..
Which, for any rich investor anons lurking, I already have a commercial application right now that would generate billions in revenue in 5 years and trillions in 10.
Only reason I havent done it on a small scale is because I don't have the money to onboard my team of MIT guys who charge $300.00 an hour..
Remind me again the name of this form of math?
I did a huge dig on it years ago and I forgot
Remind me again the name of this form of math?
I did a huge dig on it years ago and I forgot