Just got banned from 4chan for speaking truth. I can't even exist there more than a day without getting some Jannie ass-mad over pointing out what's really going on in the world.
WTF.
Q was posting and hanging out with anons from Oct 2017 to Dec 2020. The super sekrit network jumped from twitter, to parler, to gab, to tele-whatever. Besides, at this point, you should know that everything's 100% under control, and we're just watching the normies… well, pic related.
Jim and Hiroshimoot know each other well. 4chan's a different operation. It's interesting, too, because the thread I got muh ban from was showing how an underage rapper has her own OnlyFans now. Anons were opining about how it works with these kids getting shoved through the abuse channels to become celebrities. I dropped some Miley truth, and got the hammer. Didn't post anything illegal, though they claimed a Rule 1 violation. It's really interesting to see how these honeypots work, and ponder exactly who is working for whom. But to really answer your question, someone most definitely wants this place taken down, though I'm a bit surprised Jim doesn't just come here and post himself from time to time just to say "Hi" or "Hey, thanks for bringing traffic to my site. Are you guys ok?" or "Please kindly fuck off" or something of that nature.
List of slides:
Schumann
Adrenochrome
Magical cure-alls with no proof
Aliums/Reptilians
Baker Drama
Datefagging
Clockfagging
JB models
E-Celeb fuckery (all of them; especially the ones that used to post here)
Tits/Porn Posting
"muh joos"
UFO Tech
DUMBs
Biblefags
Pindar
"TRUST…" naggers
Race baiters
Gore
RH blood types
Pledians
Joe supporters
and AFLB
There are more, but that's a decent start just off the top of my head.
It'll be his most watched episode since the Mueller investigation featuring "Welcome my panel of experts featuring Don Bongino, John Solomon, and Sara A. Carter" days.
Forgot about 5G.
I categorized that as "E-Celeb fuckery" because they all made a buck or two at least. Doesn't really matter, though, I suppose.
Yep! Can't forget about those asshats.
Wait, Bannon is reporting on something that doesn't involve Hunter's dick, or making $$ selling t-shirts off of memes they got from Qresearch?
>Is Bannon the new Rush
Did Rush ever run a Chinese-based World of Warcraft gold mining operation on kid labor?
"No" is the correct answer. I'm not sure about the rest of your post because it's inconsequential to the question asked, A, and B, I'm not seeing the evidence to support your claim.
If the Bible is real, then God shows up from time to time to do some things, shake things up a bit, and even engaged in child (well, Son) sacrifice to get things set straight. Seems a bit unnecessary, but I'm sure God has his reasons. Although, the change in philosophy after having a kid was a welcomed turning point in human history because before that, it was all thous, doths, and yeas, and shan'ts, and people killing each other (like it is now, but more "biblical"). After allowing people to kill the messiah, and handing things over to the Venetians who handed it over to Constantine, it became Warning! Warning! Warning! Do what we say or you will burn in Hell!!!!! for a couple of thousands of years, and then Joe became "president".
Now the part I missed in the Bible is where C_I_A takes over the USA as part of a US Mil plan to reveal to the masses of the world the issues with Communism, but I suppose there's a way to stretch the allegory in there, (dragons and babylon giving birth or something about stars and wormwood), waiting for a perceptive anon to make the correlation. The world could always use another Kim Clement, right?
In all honesty, I think this anon is spot on with this post:
What you witnessed today was actually circumventing that very thing. It does absolutely nothing but make anons lives miserable, and this has been brought to BOs attention hundreds of times.
I do see how a tripcode system for bakes would work, but that'd require BO and BVs to abandon the notion that we should continue to use the whole buffalo/tamale, and actually put restrictions on the bake using said system, which brings back the "BO has to approve bakes" problem they were trying to avoid from the get-go. I'm not sure it's something that can be done because it still doesn't solve the problem that the shill is able to fill a bread in minutes without posting images, putting everyone right back where we started with the same problem still in effect. It also requires the BO/BVs to "full time" it here, and in all honesty, without Q posting at least irregularly, there's no real point. Anons could simply make a board somewhere else, or just do what we do here in places all over (which was the point of Q in its entirety, really).
It would keep down on the board getting flooded, but not the breads themselves, is what I'm saying.