the truth that they are expected not to combat these myriad, unending and dedicated interlopers, but to embrace them, accept their own disenfranchisement, accept the loss of their fathers lands, their own impoverishment, their own replacement. they were attacks on my people, attacks on my culture, attacks on my faith and attacks on my soul. more immigrants are choosing to retain their own healthy culture, year by year, and even more telling, our own people are beginning to join them, looking outside their own watered down and deteriorating culture to look for purpose and guidance from outside sources. physical force is the ultimate form of support. 2.answers to my people/supporters questions what are your views? to most of all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will never conquer our lands and they will never replace our people. they see the decay all around them, plummeting, free-falling birth rates all across the western world. the nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the people ’ s republic of china. for now we appeal to the anger and black comedic nature of the present, but eventually we will need to show the warmth and genuine love we have for our people. why were we allowing the invaders to conquer us? i had a regular childhood, without any great issues.

don ’ t believe me, can anymore tell you the motivation of the madrid train bomber attackers? no one is inspired by jeb bush. destabilize, then take control. to take the fight to the invaders myself. finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the united states on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the united states.this conflict over the 2 nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the us along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. a vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change.