to ensure the existence of our people and a future for white children, whilst preserving and exulting nature and the natural order. why attack immigrants when “ x ” are the issue? won ’ t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights in the new zealand? anything else is a defeat. i am just a regular white man, from a regular family. to show the effect of direct action, lighting a path forward for those that wish to follow.a path for those that wish to free their ancestors lands from the invaders grasp and to be a beacon for those that wish to create a lasting culture, to tell them they are not alone. they would not be ignored. that was during a triumphant victory. refuse. so no, i don ’ t believe so. finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the united states on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the united states.this conflict over the 2 nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the us along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.

were/are you a nationalist? the global and corporate ran press controls them, the education system (long since fallen to the long march through the institutions committed by the marxists) controls them, the state (long since heavily lost to its corporate backers) controls them and the anti-white media machine controls them. no, there isn ’ t a successful, influential grand movement established just yet, and no leading organizations, so there is no great structure created that could be brought to harm. white people are failing to reproduce, failing to create families, failing to have children. all i can guarantee is that inaction is sure defeat, power structures will be tested and likely will fall and most of all there is only the future ahead and attempting to march back to any earlier time will get you no where at all. introduction it ’ s the birthrates.