Anonymous ID: f0ad05 Feb. 18, 2021, 2:16 p.m. No.12986362   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I've been having some fun updating the Plandemic Timeline.

→ https://www.timetoast.com/timelines/plandemic-timeline

 

Among other things, I found this:

→ https://health.ucdavis.edu/health-news/newsroom/new-cutting-edge-rapid-test-detects-both-covid-19-and-flu/2020/11

It seems that at least one of the COVID-19 tests also detects flu. Gee, do you wonder where the flu went? Do you really think they’ll be checking all positive results to find out which virus caused it?

 

Has anyone looked into that rumor post about the virologist who received 5000 positive COVID-19 samples and found that they were ALL flu? Maybe there's something to it, given the article above, but we can't be posting mere rumors to the normies.

 

That wiggly nanobot was posted on my timeline today. (Click the first photo and expand to see it do its thing. It’s just a GIF—it won’t go off site.) The context implied that it was found in a vaccine. But I tracked it down. It actually came from here:

→ https://lifeboat.com/blog/2017/08/a-nanobot-picks-up-a-sperm-by-the-tail-and-inseminates-an-egg-with-it-by-the-institute-for-integrative-nanosciences-in-germany

 

We do know that some kind of nanotech is used with the mRNA in the vaccines, but I don't know if we can say that the wiggly thing is it.

→ https://www.statnews.com/2020/12/01/how-nanotechnology-helps-mrna-covid19-vaccines-work/

 

I also found this:

→ https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html

Note the header that says “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Will Be Rigorously Evaluated for Safety.” The operative words are “WILL BE!” That’s in the future. The vaccine hasn’t been evaluated for safety yet! If you take it now, you're a test Guinea pig.

 

Friends, please don’t rush out to be first to take the COVID-19 vaccine. We don’t even know the true prevalence of the virus, given that at least one test shows positive results for flu as well.