historical, societal and statistical reasons. not by the maneuvers of the lobbies and the parliaments and the congresses, it will come under the stress of necessity. it is far better to encourage radical, violent change regardless of its origins. the left has controlled all discussion regarding environmental preservation whilst simultaneously presiding over the continued destruction of the natural environment itself through mass immigration and uncontrolled urbanization, whilst offering no true solution to either issue. giving your own earned wealth, which you received through your own labour, to a person or group that despises you, places laws into effect that disenfranchises your people and seeks to ethnically replace you is utterly foolish. they were an obvious, visible and large group of invaders, from a culture with higher fertility rates, higher social trust and strong, robust traditions that seek to occupy my peoples lands and ethnically replace my own people. until the hagia sophia is free of the minarets, the men of europe are men in name only the rape of european women invaders many of you may already know about the rape of british women by the invading forces, rotherham of course being the most well known case. do not expect to survive, the only thing you should expect is a true war and to die the death of a true soldier. no.no group ordered my attack, i make the decision myself. depending on the definition, sure. sir oswald mosley is the person from history closest to my own beliefs.
do you consider it a terrorist attack? the war will not be easy, the death toll will assuredly be high. conservatism is dead. do you believe you are better than these men? a muslim man or woman living in their homelands? no. the natural environment? western culture?