>>1299461

Feb. 21

We are moving up the timetable.

Apr. 27

Timetables shift.

[Next Week].

So Jan 13th would be 111 days ago, Jan 19th 105? days ago, timetable moved up? or Timetable varies as required? Both possible, I can definitely see the Jan 19th → Today connection though!

>>1299567

Yes, that's what inspired my post. it all makes sense to me, VERY timely

>>1299612

Yes, I caught that last bread as well. So you're saying that the connection is solely with the time stamps, rather than the 111 day theory?

>>1299637

Multi layer indeed!

Time stamps

111 day future proves past

Mirror

Wind the clock

Q Post & POTUS tweet deltas

Keywords which show up in the future proving past

Misspellings

+++ + +++

• ++ +++

etc etc etc etc>

I'm an "all of the above" kinda anon, I can stand that possibility that comms contain all of the above and THEN SOME. Happy to entertain any and all connections discovered.

>>1299673

You've asked one of my favorite questions, and my answer to that is (almost) always YES!

In this case definite yes!!! re: >>1299722

full circle, 6 months to the day

Nov 4 - May 4

15:02 timestamp