i chose firearms for the affect it would have on social discourse, the extra media coverage they would provide and the affect it could have on the politics of united states and thereby the political situation of the world. finally there are those that find themselves in the ethnic or racial minority and find their very own genes being bred out of existence through miscegenation and differing racial birth rates. i want your neck under my boot. i had a regular childhood, without any great issues. i could no longer ignore the attacks. that difference was ebba akerlund. victors write the history and the writers of history control the cultural climate of the present time. europes value is in the european people the time after the baby boomers have passed isn't the time to start acting, but the time we should be finishing our victory. we are coming for constantinople and we will destroy every mosque and minaret in the city. force is power. your grand children?

diversity is weakness, unity is strength radicalization of western men the radicalization of young western men is not just unavoidable, but inevitable. were/are you a nationalist? this is cultural replacement. finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the united states on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the united states.this conflict over the 2 nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the us along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. why make your children fight, when you could fight in their stead? a vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change.