is it not preferable to die in war rather than suffer any longer so horrible a spectacle? attacking these mosques also allowed for an extra planned attack on the mosque in ashburton, whilst i am unsure as of this time of writing whether i will reach that target, it was a bonus objective. it is far better to encourage radical, violent change regardless of its origins. why were we allowing these soldiers deaths to be in vain? you can not expect others do take the risks for you, nor should you wish for others to labour for you, if you are unwilling. yes, beyond all doubt, anti-immigration, anti-ethnic replacement and anti-cultural replacement. the french people were often in a minority themselves, and the french that were in the streets were often alone, childless or of advanced age. the second event was the 2017 french general election. i remember pulling into a shopping centre car park to buy groceries in some moderate sized town in eastern france, of roughly 15-25 thousand people. our lands are not their home, they can return to their own lands or found their homelands elsewhere. its the cities where the struggle lies, its the cities where the invaders have massed, its the cities where the marxists have poisoned the institutions, its the cities where the traitorous media and corporations lie and its the cities where the anti-white politicians and the ngos make their homes.
these men would stall and delay any action indefinitely, until all necessary action has been undertaken by some other, more courageous man. they were not easily moved, they were icy – willing to wait till every count should be proved, ere the saxon began to hate. does anyone even ask why? crush these traitor ngos, kill their leadership, burn down their buildings, bomb their ships, tear down their posters and destroy their membership. that should surprise no one. eventually, when the white population of the usa realizes the truth of the situation, war will erupt.
>why them when i could do it myself?