no. not in europe, not in the americas, not in australia or new zealand. no, the attack was not an attack on diversity, but an attack in the name of diversity. radical, explosive action is the only desired, and required, response to an attempted genocide. the united states is one of the most diverse nations on earth, and they are about an inch away from tearing each other to pieces. why should others fight for you if you are not willing to fight for yourself? the cities are the economic, judicial, political, ethnic and cultural battleground of our people and it is there we shall wage our war. to create an atmosphere of fear and change in which drastic, powerful and revolutionary action can occur. we are coming for constantinople and we will destroy every mosque and minaret in the city. no man spoke it aloud when the saxon began to hate. there is no pleasant meadow in which you can lay down your weary body, rest your head and wait for it all to blow over.

were/are you a “ islamophobe ”? but once i arrived in france, i found the stories to not only be true, but profoundly understated. for example, actions such as voting for political candidates that radically change or challenge entrenched systems, radicalizing public discourse by both supporting, attacking, vilifying, radicalizing and exaggerating all societal conflicts and attacking or even assassinating weak or less radical leaders/influencers on either side of social conflicts. how is this possible? monotonous repetition of immigration facts and statistics will simply bore the masses, and drive the people away from the stale and uninspired speakers that propagate them. the only option for a true man or woman of europe is to labour, labour with all effort towards victory.