to create an atmosphere of fear and change in which drastic, powerful and revolutionary action can occur. dear god no. whilst the immigrants were young, energized and with large families and many children. the nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the people ’ s republic of china. in time, the truth will be revealed. focusing on increasing the population of whites, or trying to gain economic wealth or military might, whilst already having met the requirement of numbers, wealth and military force needed is simply a stalling tactic, spoken and put forth by men too cowardly to do what is required. that should surprise no one. that is a very broad category of people, and the definition is fuzzy at best. they are also one of the strongest groups, with high fertility, high in group preference and a will to conquer. these are the things that speak to people, connect people, drive people. the weaker we become the more immigrants will refuse to join us, refuse to partake in the cultural suicide that we extol.

why make your children fight, when you could fight in their stead? in this time period a series of events broke down my own reserves, my reservations, my cynicism and revealed the truth of the wests current situation. for too long we have allowed the left to co-opt the environmentalist movement to serve their own needs. good men, the last wave by, crying how bright their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay, rage, rage against the dying of the light. a vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change. we must excel, both personally and as a society.