we can fight the armed invader, we know how, we have the ability, we have the soldiers and arms to do so. flee to your own lands, while you still have the chance section ii general thoughts and potential strategies ``it will come in one way and one way alone, not through existing governments. meanwhile they badger, trick and guilt-shame the european people into forfeiting their own hard earned income and giving it directly to their peoples cultural and ethnic competitors, many of which have the only intent of conquering and destroying the european peoples. beyond this place of wrath and tears looms but the horror of the shade, and yet the menace of the years finds and shall find me unafraid. wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight, and learn, too late, they grieved it on its way, do not go gentle into that good night. just do not allow your scepticism to turn to paranoia and keep you from supporting those that want the best for you. who do you follow? the united states is one of the most diverse nations on earth, and they are about an inch away from tearing each other to pieces. we attack as soon as possible, we attack with force and we achieve stability and play defense as the boomers pass, not during their passing, not after. they are the most despised group of invaders in the west, attacking them receives the greatest level of support. look to the heart of the conflict, march yourself there, press yourself into service.

in my mind a rainbow is only beautiful to due its variety of colours, mix the colours together and you destroy them all and they are gone forever and the end result is far from anything beautiful. the weaker we become the more immigrants will refuse to join us, refuse to partake in the cultural suicide that we extol. what makes you think that you have all the answers? why make your children fight, when you could fight in their stead? only when you embrace death and the only thing you will have left to fear is inaction. the survival of our people, our culture and our lands isn ’ t enough.

>this is cultural replacement.

no man spoke it aloud when the saxon began to hate. to show the effect of direct action, lighting a path forward for those that wish to follow.a path for those that wish to free their ancestors lands from the invaders grasp and to be a beacon for those that wish to create a lasting culture, to tell them they are not alone. why won ’ t somebody do something? if convicted, do you expect to stay in prison? so yes. depending on the definition, sure. to agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to cause them to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result. no.a jew living in israel is no enemy of mine, so long as they do not seek to subvert or harm my people. the idea that a frenchmen need not speak the language, share the culture, believe in the same god or even more importantly be ethnically french is ludicrous in the extreme. an act, which morals you doubt in the present, will be writ by your people in wonder and admiration in the books of history. b.

is it not preferable to die in war rather than suffer any longer so horrible a spectacle? what matters is your actions during the brief time between birth and death. all else is insufficient. there is no one person equal to any other, not identical twins, not countrymen, not workers within a class group and certainly not those of differing races. secondly an attack in new zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that no where in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was no where left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration. there is no pleasant meadow in which you can lay down your weary body, rest your head and wait for it all to blow over.