We are nearing the end of test two.
Welcome.
>
>What are they afraid of? The gallows in front of the White House have been removed.
>Trump supporters are planning to storm the Capitol again on 4 March, lawmaker warns
>
Test Two Completion Date?
Or?
ALL LB
BETTY PAGE FOR BETTY BO!
i HAZ UPGRAYYEDD for tha Surverez
Kanz We goe bak yeet?
So uh…
Bout muh qannonnersz and XKun…
For all the accusations of white supremecists here…'''
Never have I ever…
Seen one call it 8coon…
>https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/02/putins-corrupt-pipeline-is-on-life-support/
>
>https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-russian-gas-pipeline-is-driving-a-wedge-between-the-u-s-and-its-allies-11552254955
Just because you write shitty hit pieces on other leaders doesn't mean the military will protect you if they pay you a visit. . . nd you end up somewhere in a Siberian Gulag
What was up with the other writers focusing on his children?
Fucking satanists at work buddy.
Didnt he just Join in the Epiphany?
Hmmm
About "his Shadow Daughter… " Accusations of a son in entertainment albeit could simply be similar genetics…
ANYWAY…
They starting to try to treat him like Trump… Hmmm..
Arent they starting a new currency in spring 21?
Double hmmm….
This is worth the repost.
>>>12995981 (You)
>
>about the closest was a South Park "The Coon" episode reference. Same, never seen't it ever.
>
>That racism narritiave is as fake as the premise of Obama's Beer Summit.
Which is exactly why I susucoined it.
Excuse me sirs do you even multiculturalism?
Excuse me sir did you assume my ''GenderHue?''
>…Who defines what is hate speech and what is not?
Why is it called a speech if it isn't spoken because it is merely TEXT or a "PREPARED SPEECH" until it is…
ERHMAGHAD IM AM SO TRIGGERED!
''So where you wann go after the Supreme Court Guys?''
So… about this Supreme court thing…
Someone was trying to minimize it stating that oh it's on thuh huhuhuhuh thuh thing…
It appears actions have been going o upon further examination, QUITE a bit of little things the media has not been talking about…
Dec 29 2020 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 3, 2021)
PetitionProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
Dec 29 2020 Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioners.
Main DocumentProof of Service
Jan 04 2021 Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank not accepted for filing. (Brief rejected and docket corrected January 19, 2021)
Jan 11 2021 Motion to expedite consideration filed by petitioners DENIED
Jan 15 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Ann S. Jacobs, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
Jan 19 2021 Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank not accepted for filing. (February 17, 2021)
Jan 20 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Dane County Clerk and Dane County Board of Canvassers to respond filed.
Main Document
Jan 21 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Joseph R. Biden and Kamala D. Harris to respond filed.
Main Document
Jan 25 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Milwaukee County Clerk, Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers to respond filed.
Main Document
Jan 27 2021 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
Feb 17 2021 Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank not accepted for filing. (February 18, 2021)
Feb 18 2021 Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank submitted.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
Make sure you pray for the Lawyer and their family, How are the other ones doing?
James Roberts Troupis
Counsel of Record
God Bless em.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-882.html
No. 20-882
Title: Donald J. Trump, et al., Petitioners
v.
Joseph R. Biden, et al.
Docketed: January 4, 2021
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Case Numbers: (2020AP2038)
Decision Date: December 14, 2020
Date Proceedings and Orders
Dec 29 2020 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 3, 2021)
PetitionProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
Dec 29 2020 Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioners.
Main DocumentProof of Service
Jan 04 2021 Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank not accepted for filing. (Brief rejected and docket corrected January 19, 2021)
Jan 11 2021 Motion to expedite consideration filed by petitioners DENIED
Jan 15 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Ann S. Jacobs, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
Jan 19 2021 Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank not accepted for filing. (February 17, 2021)
Jan 20 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Dane County Clerk and Dane County Board of Canvassers to respond filed.
Main Document
Jan 21 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Joseph R. Biden and Kamala D. Harris to respond filed.
Main Document
Jan 25 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Milwaukee County Clerk, Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers to respond filed.
Main Document
Jan 27 2021 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
Feb 17 2021 Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank not accepted for filing. (February 18, 2021)
Feb 18 2021 Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank submitted.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
Unformatted of course but that info is there.
>
>
>Jan 15 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Ann S. Jacobs, et al. to respond filed.
>
> Main Document
>
>Jan 19 2021 Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank not accepted for filing. (February 17, 2021)
>
>
>
>Jan 20 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Dane County Clerk and Dane County Board of Canvassers to respond filed.
>
> Main Document
>
>Jan 21 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Joseph R. Biden and Kamala D. Harris to respond filed.
>
> Main Document
>
>Jan 25 2021 Waiver of right of respondents Milwaukee County Clerk, Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers to respond filed.
>
> Main Document
So…
Do these… Waivers or right of respondents, is this just for the Lawyers to speak on their behalf or… a waiving their defense essentially?
well well welll guess Im not the only one interested, check these search results…
https://www.bing.com/search?form=MOZTSB&pc=MOZI&q=Waiver+of+right+of+respondents
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081120105055AAH0sOl
heThatDoesNotWantToBeNamedLv 5
asked in Politics & Government
Law & Ethics · 1 decade ago
What does "Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed." mean?
Note this is the last update on the Berg vs. Obama case on the Supreme Court docket.
1 Answer
btw's avatar
btw
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
I believe it means literally "FEC (et al) Waives Right to Respond to Berg Petition". They have a right to respond to Berg Petition, but they refuse (give up) to use their right, and they are waiting for a decision from the court. What can we expect to see in this decision? Maybe a new (and this time final (?)) confirmation that Berg doesn't have a "standing" to ask the question he asked? What's your bet???
Source(s): http://www.americasright.com/2008/11/us-supreme-co… Wednesday, November 19, 2008 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions on Berg, Donofrio Cases Could Be Imminent FEC Waives Right to Respond to Berg Petition, Court to Address Donofrio Action in Conference
>Maybe a new (and this time final (?)) confirmation that Berg doesn't have a "standing" to ask the question he asked? What's your bet???
''Let me rephrase this…''
Maybe… Biden++ doesn't have a "standing" to ask the question he asked? What's your bet???
>The 2022 election will be rigged and stolen just like the 2020 …Something has to give before then…They will and are going after Trump and his family…Can't foresee Trump doing nothing about it
>
Why try to distance from the 2020 election with an active supreme court filing that has been having some work done since fucking december… so…
Kek… I got work to do, but yes done here for a while. I think Jim just flew over my house with Hotwheels pullin the sleigh or whatever.
Africka Knows what's up.
>BAKER, NOTE THIS IS A SHILL
>
>The text of the National Review article has been deceptively edited in multiple places.
The what?
those words are not from the article?
It only shows their own character when sharing and venting their microaggression
>If Biden gets this 11 million people amnesty which is actually closer to 19 million ..plus all the others coming it and mail in voting passes ..what do you think will happen…He NEVER got close to 50 million let along the 80 million they claimed …Trump Won by a landslide
Hmm… I concur
>>12996183 We sexy B
wsexyb
Ohohohohoho!>>12996213
>7.4.2020 During unrelenting leftists riots GEOTUS goes to Mount Rushmore, in a state run by MAGA stalwart Noem (a second tier gov Official).
>
>Mount Rushmore is GRANITE.
>
>His speech was given in Granite Shadow.
WHOA!
Where is mount rush more… hmmm,
BAM
That's pretty central eh?
Rush Rush, Rush just passed? Gatekeeping?
Gate Stargate Rushmore?
New Capitol Location?
Discussion in the past on moving the Capitol Location to a more Central and Secure Location…
Much Like…
''Russia''
Our Ally.
>>12996260 (You)
You sound like A FAKE NEWS REPORTER!
Just kidding.
All is well the uber corrupt are freaking out be we are cool, how is tejas speaking of cool, NYC?
Alec Baldwin Told Cuomo to Sit Down'''
UH WILL EEEND YOU
ROLL YOUR ASS OVER CUOMO
I heard she's bangin grandpas for big bucks while looking to settle down.
ah to take all that corruption and turn it to good,
Looks like a happy feeling the idea of it.
This shit is fake and Gay, they arent allowed to do that, go grab the original image, it's a Trump Flag
where is da bred