>>13000882 pb
>Moar importantly, what's he saying lately.
>https://omny.fm/shows/mornings-on-the-mall/wmal-interview-joe-digenova-02-15-21
he says "if republicans take control in 2022"
"they could impeach bummer ag holder for F&F
or bidan for his conspiracy to frame flynn"
"but dems know that with MSM on their side they can do what they like, and muhpublicans would never do it anyway"
and "mcconnell was a victim of the riot"
Didn't give me the hopium I was probably seeking
>bearers of false gifts
sabotage?
I tend to think man made.
because the technology to make them has improved in conjunction with human tech.
why was this form not available in 1975
hidden tech. weather tech was hushed up in the 60s for example.
Who do you believe and why. Laurance interested in these. paid money
Even something like Q's AF1 photos. Proves on AF1, proves not a larp, but what else does it prove? How many fakes were in Trump's inner circle?
Imagine if something like this is out there, and clearly there is a question about fake info. Something says it's good but is not - who knows? Maybe someone does.
I often find from my own studies, that the question of epistemology is central.
We have been taught none.
Only deductive logic is the only form 99+% of people know - totally limiting.
Who do you trust and why. x files said trust no one. Clearly that is self destructive. But who do you trust and why
we elected the wrong carter - patton
mercury looks more like lord lucan than that dude