in the event of an engagement i had the somewhat quixotic notion of shouting down responding state enforcers, intimidating them into dropping their weapons and if that failed, only targeting non-vital areas of their body such as the anterior of the thigh, shoulder or a side-on through shot of the calf, hamstring or gluteal muscles so as to cause the least amount of harm as possible and to allow for a quick recovery. the people speaking now, acting now, fighting now, are the vanguard of the vanguard of the force of the people. if there is one thing i want you to remember from these writings, its that the birthrates must change. you are the voice, you are the klaxon call, you hold the first spear to be thrust at the invaders. they slaved for a better future for their people, and now other peoples shake their fists and point their fingers, reprimanding us for living better lives, wealthier lives in wealthier countries. new zealand was not the original choice for attack, i only arrived to new zealand to live temporarily whilst i planned and trained, but i soon found out that new zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the west.

young, innocent and dead ebba. now let us bury it and move on to something of worth. enemies bound by faith, culture or tradition with higher levels of fertility, trust and in group preference resulting in much stronger communities. no.the police force in new zealand is on overall good terms with the public and, unlike in other european nations such as france, the uk, or norway they have so far remained loyal to the people.so harming the nz police officers was to be avoided at all costs unless the state enforcer was from an invaders background. no. better for you to face them now then your kin to face them in the future.