the issue is complicated, far more complicated and difficult to fix than the issue of ethnic replacement. no, people will forget my motivations quickly and only remember the attack itself. states hate other states, the electoral college is under attack at every turn and the races are at each others throats. because if we do not destroy the invaders first, our own birthrates will mean nothing. when they demand you pay, refuse. for many years i had been hearing and reading of the invasion of france by non-whites, many of these rumours and stories i believed to be exaggerations, created to push a political narrative. so yes. as only in times of radical change and social discomfort can great and terrific change occur. a vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change. men of the west must be men once more. physical force is the ultimate form of support.
more immigrants are choosing to retain their own healthy culture, year by year, and even more telling, our own people are beginning to join them, looking outside their own watered down and deteriorating culture to look for purpose and guidance from outside sources. do you consider it a terrorist attack? we must inevitably correct the disaster of hedonistic, nihilistic individualism. grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay, rage, rage against the dying of the light. all through immigration. to agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to over extend their own hand and experience the eventual backlash.