a political candidate that keeps the status quo or only seeks to introduce minimal change, even when the minimal change is in support of our cause, is ultimately useless or even damaging. to take the fight to the invaders myself. accept death, embrace infamy, achieve victory numbers aren ’ t everything in 2019, we currently have the largest number of people of our race in history (between 760-980million depending on definitions), yet we are losing even our smallest towns to ethnic replacement. do not pay to have your people destroyed, do not line the pockets of the traitors within our ranks, don ’ t lend support to a corrupt and broken state. what part of diversity causes this increase in strength? were you taught violence and extremism by video games, music, literature, cinema?

only elect leaders that show support to your brother nation. no matter if it takes 3 years or 30 years, these people must pay for their disgusting attacks upon our race. the nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the people ’ s republic of china. hell, even meme. i remember pulling into a shopping centre car park to buy groceries in some moderate sized town in eastern france, of roughly 15-25 thousand people. something that had been a part of my life for as long as i could remember, cynicism in the face of attacks on the west by islamic invaders, was suddenly no longer there.

>did you really expect they would not also lose their rights?