the christchurch and linwood mosques had far more invaders, in a more prominent and optically foreign building, with less students, more adults and a prior history of extremism. with enough pressure the left wing within the united states will seek to abolish the second amendment, and the right wing within the us will see this as an attack on their very freedom and liberty. there is no nation in the world that wasn ’ t founded by, or maintained by, the use of force. it is not just a matter of our prosperity, but the very survival of our people. they were an obvious, visible and large group of invaders, from a culture with higher fertility rates, higher social trust and strong, robust traditions that seek to occupy my peoples lands and ethnically replace my own people. if they could die, so can you. diversity is anathema to equality. break it ’ s back, anyway you can. a a one-point-seven percentage point difference may mean something to a few, but a ingeniously worded expression or brilliantly crafted poster will convince the many. these are the things that speak to people, connect people, drive people. because if we do not destroy the invaders first, our own birthrates will mean nothing.

our present comfortable, privileged and prosperous life was gifted to us by our forebears, with the belief that we would maintain, cherish and even expand upon their work, so that one day our own children can enjoy the rewards of our labour. overcome us? was the attack “ islamophobic ” in origin? no two different things can ever truly be equal, especially humans. why did you choose to use firearms? a gradual change is never going to achieve victory.

>children of invaders do not stay children, they become adults and reproduce, creating more invaders to replace your people.they grow up and vote against your peoples own wishes, for the interests of their own people and identity.