why attack immigrants when “ x ” are the issue? their number uncountable, the representation of their loss unfathomable. we were born from our lands and our own culture was molded by these same lands.the protection and preservation of these lands is of the same importance as the protection and preservation of our own ideals and beliefs. the people speaking now, acting now, fighting now, are the vanguard of the vanguard of the force of the people. take from my views that which works, discard that which does not.victory is all that matters. do not fear change, we are change globalized capitalist markets are the enemy of racial autonomists if an ethnocentric european future is to be achieved global free markets and the trade of goods is to be discouraged at all costs. the united states is one of the most diverse nations on earth, and they are about an inch away from tearing each other to pieces. for example, actions such as voting for political candidates that radically change or challenge entrenched systems, radicalizing public discourse by both supporting, attacking, vilifying, radicalizing and exaggerating all societal conflicts and attacking or even assassinating weak or less radical leaders/influencers on either side of social conflicts. islamic nations in particular have high birth rates, regardless of race or ethnicity, and in this there was an anti-islamic motivation to the attacks, as well as a want for revenge against islam for the 1300 years of war and devastation that it has brought upon the people of the west and other peoples of the world. those who are not ethnically and culturally european. what matters is your actions during the brief time between birth and death.

born in australia to a working class, low income family. you will be infamous until victory is achieved. better for you to face them now then your kin to face them in the future. everywhere i travelled, barring a few small exceptions, i was treated wonderfully, often as a guest and even as a friend. destroyed in the name of cheap labour, whilst they may publicly object to the illegal immigration of the third world masses, privately they push for as much migration as possible, anything to decrease the labour cost of production and line their pockets with the profits. so yes.

>there is not a single place left where the tendrils of replacement migration have not touched.