was the attack anti-immigration in origin? the last virtues of a dying nation are tolerance and apathy, and i want none of it. physical force is the ultimate form of support. give your everything to your people. their voices were even and low, their eyes were level and straight. i will let my actions speak for themselves. we must thrive, we must march ever forward to our place among the stars and we will reach the destiny our people deserve. why did you choose this time to attack? every human is worth only their own value, no more or less. millions of invaders landing on our shores, conquering our towns and without a single shot fired in response. with risk comes possibilities, with possibilites comes chance for victory destabilization and accelerationism: tactics for victory true change and the change we need to enact only arises in the great crucible of crisis.

i begun planning an attack roughly two years in advance and an attack at the location in christchurch three months in advance. they had long since lost their cities, take a look at auckland. no, the attack was a end in itself, with all the necessary affect required. we must excel, both personally and as a society. his death will also drive a wedge between the turk invaders currently occupying our lands and the ethnic european people whilst simultaneously weakening turkeys hold on the region, removing a prime enemy of russia and destabilizing and fracturing nato. no, the attack was not an attack on diversity, but an attack in the name of diversity.