won ’ t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights in the new zealand? to take the fight to the invaders myself. the people speaking now, acting now, fighting now, are the vanguard of the vanguard of the force of the people. do you believe those you attacked were innocent? the candidates were an obvious sign of our times: a globalist, capitalist, egalitarian, an ex-investment banker was no national beliefs other than the pursuit of profit versus a milquetoast, feckless, civic nationalist, an uncontroversial figure who ’ s most brave and inspired idea resolved to the possible deportation of illegal immigrants. who would willing leave their own strong, dominant and rising culture to join an elderly, decaying, degenerate culture? when non-europeans are considered europe, than there is no europe at all. what is an australian but a drunk european? didn ’ t your attack just result in the vilification of ethno-nationalists/racial autonomists? do you consider it a terrorist attack? refuse to pay taxes.

because if we do not destroy the invaders first, our own birthrates will mean nothing. to ensure diverse peoples remain diverse, separate, unique, undiluted in unrestrained in cultural or ethnic expression and autonomy. giving your own earned wealth, which you received through your own labour, to a person or group that despises you, places laws into effect that disenfranchises your people and seeks to ethnically replace you is utterly foolish. support them socially, back their policies, attack their detractors, voice upon support to the media and in daily conversations, make it understood on the internet that all europeans nations support them. i am just a regular white man, from a regular family. a society of rampant nihilism, consumerism and individualism, where every individual is a competitor and the rights of the individual override all notions of responsibility.