Anonymous ID: 31ff00 Feb. 20, 2021, 11:32 a.m. No.13009907   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13009575

>>13009578

>>13009591

>>13009610

>>13009619

>>13009622

Go back to before 8bit handed it to FastJack, and start the account/version of events from that point forward.

 

  1. At some point, 8bit had to handed the board over due to IRL stuff. No one's perfect, but most agreed it was handled well.

  2. FJ takes over, maintains much of the same, with a couple of changes (separate notables breads was suggested, etc.). At one point, Q even posted to straighten up the place/right the ship (Maintaining hivemind was Q's main focus).

  3. At some point after that, MNR was spawned in an attempt to provide a medium to address the lack focus from qresearch.

  4. Q continued to post in qresearch in order to encourage a maintaining of focus.

  5. The attacks on the board did get worse, culminating in an attack that even made Jim clamp down.

  6. Accusations that a GV that is MNR-friendly started overstepping boundaries with qresearch BOs and BV came up. By this time, everything that happened between 1-5 had spiraled out of control in varying versions of multiple different events, causing much confusion for regular anons.

 

Somewhere between 1 and 2, there was a conflict. There are 2 sides to that conflict. It would be nice to see adults hash it out, get an official story put together, and see where things go. BO of MNR, Tom, is extending an olive branch for discourse. So far, it's started a flame war. At this point, and stage in the game, BVs, BOs, and anons have two choices.

  1. Air the grievances

  2. Keep the stalemate in place

 

It's up to anons. Typically, though, when cousins are arguing, and one of those cousins get attacked, they stick up for each other, and then settle differences after the fact.

 

8bit's thread tells his version of events. What's the other anons' versions? How does the overall effort of qresearch/mnr either suffer or gain from continuing to fight each other or reconcile? Instead of just making statements, can both sides link directly to logs to state their cases?

Anonymous ID: 31ff00 Feb. 20, 2021, 11:54 a.m. No.13010031   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0065 >>0069

>>13009794

>Since we are only on TOR our conversation has become more specific.

Provide links to conversations, then. Speed anons up by letting them read it for themselves.

 

>If I came out and told you what Im trying to tell you, you would reject it, please respect the process.

No more riddles. Just come on out with it. Those that reject whatever you say will do so. Those that don't will look for themselves. Do you honestly think that a board of hardened anons that has been told by everyone that humans are harvested for sex and food by intergalactic titans from Satan by way of the elites is going to cause anons to do a double take?

Srsly?

 

>Will this be the age of revelation?

>Who are the 144k among you?

Most people that have or currently do study eschatology believe that the 144k is absolutely allegorical. It represents the 12 thousand of each of the 12 tribes of Israel. Big problem, though. There's 13 (after Ephraim and Manasseh). If you come offering answers, then offer them. Otherwise, this is a side bar to confuse things while the boards are in the middle of trying to hash out the future of things.