Re-posted from late last bread:

I saved this capped thread (from 4chan on 01/17) that was posted here last night.

This morning I can't find it. It would have been somewhere in threads 16550-16564, inclusive.

It is worthy of note in my opinion; yours' may differ.

If it is in fact now deleted and not in any notables, that screams "DON'T LOOK HERE" to me.

While I obviously can't bring any moar sauce than what is here, It would answer a lot of unanswered

questions that have been sources of discontent and doubt in 'the plan'.

It could also (at least temporarily) give a sense of direction and focus for the near term.

I find the suggestions to be plausible.

In any case, anybody else see this and/or care to comment?

>>13008550

Nothing that I am aware of.

Posted exactly as I saved it.

It didn't offend mcaffee or malwarebytes, for whatever that's worth.

>>13008611

Kind of like the stock market . . .

Appears legit on the surface, but easily manipulated from behind the curtain.

HHmmmmmmm . . . .

>>13008623

I wonder if Lurch is paying Al "The Goracle" royalties for picking up that 'no longer burning' torch.

>>13008617

Happy to do that. Would .jpg suffice?

>>13008672

Not the first time I've been blind.

Would you please tell me where?

I still seem unable to find it.

>>13008719

I wasn't really pushing fora notable,, but rather 'eyes on'.

Obviously the main crux was to highlight the Supreme Court.

Given that, it could be good or it could be bad.

Good - everything there is legit.

Bad - disinfo meant to highlight the S.C. with the result being counterproductive for OUR purposes.

I don't necessarily dis agree with your assessment. Just found this to be interesting, then it's absence kind of weird.