by the definition, then yes. it is not just a matter of our prosperity, but the very survival of our people. i came upon a cemetery, one of the many mass cemeteries created to bury the french and other european soldiers lost in the wars that crippled europe. this is a tactic practiced not only on the french people, but on all the peoples of europe, effectively destroying the nations identity at its core and smashing apart all bonds which a successful, unified nation is built upon. to see this in full effect, you only have to look at the population statistics in western nations for the year 2100. https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_countries_by_future_population_ (u nited_nations, _medium_fertility_variant) in 2100, despite the ongoing effect of sub-replacement fertility, the population figures show that the population does not decrease inline with the sub-replacement fertility levels, but actually maintains and, even in many white nations, rapidly increases. i had the will and i had the resources. secondly an attack in new zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that no where in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was no where left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration. as for how the public perceives us? drive them from your lands and give the traitors what traitors deserve: a traitors death. it โ s the birthrates. was the attack โ racist โ in origin?
venerate the ancestors but work for the children a soldiers fight the ideal of a heroic war, without loss, without failure, without some great setback, is idealistic and downright impossible. prepare for war, prepare for violence and prepare for risk, loss, struggle, death. were/are you a conservative? those that wish a future for white children, and to ensure the existence of our people. without a single shot fired in response? preventing these enemies from reaching adulthood and their full potential of effect is of the importance.