dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

You have failed to uphold your oath of office!

Justices take two oaths or the combined oath, “I, , do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as under the Constitution and laws of the United States; and that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

Your failure to uphold your oath of office in the stolen Presidential 2020 Election

Myanmar Time!

>>13025085

They have failed to uphold their constitutional oath to protect our constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. Corrupt Puppets!

NEW SIDNEY POWELL

Cert denied today in all 2020 election law cases. https://www.supremecourt.gov/…/court…/022221zor_2cp3.pdf

Denials with Dissents

Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid (formerly Boockvar), began with Application for stay filed September 28, 2020. No. 20-542. (CU/CUF/TPC amicus brief in this case on November 25, 2020.)
Corman (formerly Scarnati) v. Pennsylvania Democratic Party. Petitioners are Pennsylvania state legislators, began with Petition filed October 27, 2020. No. 20-574.

In these two cases, Thomas dissented and Alito/Gorsuch also dissented.

Roberts and Kavanaugh and Barrett joined the Dems Dissents appear at the end of the Order list.

As Thomas said: "These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

Denials without any dissent.

Congressman Mike Kelly v. Pennsylvania, began with Application for injunctive relief filed December 3, 2020. No. 20-810.
Trump v. Degraffenreid (PA), No. 20-845, began with Petition for Cert filed December 21, 2020.

This was John Eastman's case.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022221zor_2cp3.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0ztZc3TKwIgfClUNBJTrkwcsP6vy-D49Ty33RcvSnwy0DgDJghzRmspyw

We no longer have a country, we no longer have a constitution or bill of rights, just corrupt Politicians, Judges, Media & Elections.

Trump, Allies Rejected by U.S. Supreme Court on Election Appeals

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected appeals filed in December to try to overturn President Joe Biden’s election victories in five key states, marking the end of cases that sought to keep Donald Trump in the White House.

The justices without comment Monday turned away appeals that challenged the results in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. The cases included two filed by Trump himself and others pressed by his Republican allies.

The high court signaled months ago it wasn’t interested in hearing the appeals, which claimed without foundation that Biden’s wins were the product of widespread fraud, caused in part by the use of mail-in ballots. The court previously refused to issue emergency orders in the cases or put them on a fast track.

The justices also refused to take up a narrower case from the 2020 election centering on Pennsylvania mail ballots. Republicans said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court usurped its authority by ordering a three-day extension of the Election Day deadline for ballots to arrive because of the pandemic and expected mail delays.

State officials said fewer than 10,000 ballots were received during the three-day period after Election Day, a small fraction of the number Trump would have needed to overturn Biden’s 80,555-vote win in the state.

The rejected cases are Wood v. Raffensperger, 20-799; Ward v. Jackson, 20-809; Kelly v. Pennsylvania, 20-810; King v. Whitmer, 20-815; Trump v. Degraffenreid, 20-845; and Trump v. Biden, 20-882.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-22/trump-allies-rejected-by-u-s-supreme-court-on-election-appeals?fbclid=IwAR0gDnpyViWqaYLephvBoNOVyh6Aep6rVQX4Zu2nWapv35mkSGd3AgLR2ec

Corrupt Politicians and Judges…We Are No Longer Free

After the Supreme Court turned away two Republican appeals over Pennsylvania's mail-in ballot deadline changes, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas issued a blistering dissent against the decision to reject the case.

"One wonders what this Court waits for," Justice Thomas wrote. "We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections.

"The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling."

Three conservative Justices Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch sought to hear the cases, while Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the liberal justices in turning then away. Justice Amy Coney Barrett did not take part on cases that preceded her swearing in.

"By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence," Justice Thomas' dissent concluded. "Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more from us.

"I respectfully dissent."

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/clarence-thomas-election-law-scotus-voter-fraud/2021/02/22/id/1011008/?fbclid=IwAR2wwCsX_mjTqeQE-hYbNuwKbe_RRBL5aC3bL61JFBO71Dd8sBVP-Jh1aEw