Anonymous ID: 0348f3 Feb. 23, 2021, 8:30 a.m. No.13031363   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Is Sund Lying? His previous statements –

 

The former chief of the federal force, Steven Sund, told the Washington Post his supervisors were reluctant to take formal steps to put the Guard on call even as police intelligence suggested that the crowd President Donald Trump had invited to Washington to protest against his defeat was probably going to be much larger than earlier demonstrations.

 

Sund’s remarks were in contrast with those from officials in other branches of government, who said after Trump’s supporters stormed into the Capitol building last Wednesday that they could have provided more people to secure it – but no one from the Capitol Police asked.

 

Sund told the newspaper in an interview he had asked House and Senate security officials for permission to request that the National Guard be placed on standby in case he needed quick backup but his request was turned down.

 

Kenneth Rapuano, assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense and global security, said last week that the Pentagon had been in touch with the Capitol Police and were told that they would not require assistance from the National Guard.

 

Sund, who will step down from his post on Jan. 16 after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for his resignation, said his request for help was rejected or delayed six times.

 

“If we would have had the National Guard we could have held them at bay longer, until more officers from our partner agencies could arrive,” he told the newspaper.

 

Sund kept telling officials that “the situation is dire”, the newspaper reported.

 

The storming of the Capitol building by Trump’s supporters delayed the certification of Democratic President-elect Joe Biden’s election victory.

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-police/outgoing-u-s-capitol-police-chief-says-his-effort-to-get-help-was-thwarted-paper-idUSKBN29G0H3

Anonymous ID: 0348f3 Feb. 23, 2021, 8:35 a.m. No.13031393   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1446

>>13031375

>removed from their jurisdiction.

 

Seems logical. Something is off, which is why I asked lb.

 

Or, they never had Jurisdiction, since we may have been under a state of emergency, war time laws, etc.