Anonymous ID: fc2614 Feb. 23, 2021, 8:34 a.m. No.13031390   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1398 >>1416 >>1453

>>13031325

>>13031344

They don't really validate accounts over there.

 

>>13031331

>>13031346

Joe's an alright cheerleader. Nothing wrong with him. But if you've not seen all his stuff already, you sort of missed the boat. Folks will have to wait around until the next person can brand the movement as something other than Q while keeping the meat of the message without making it too Q-ey.

 

But if you are going to accuse MNR is keeping a lid on 2 year old "remastered" videos, you're going to need to provide some proofs.

Anonymous ID: fc2614 Feb. 23, 2021, 8:37 a.m. No.13031406   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13031374

See, I miss out on this stuff because I usually just ignore the eceleb shit that everyone else keeps falling for. Would've been nice to see the look on his face when he got visited, though, I can tell you that.

Anonymous ID: fc2614 Feb. 23, 2021, 8:41 a.m. No.13031432   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13031398

Like that Gen McInerney account that also gets pushed? The lack of a verification system is perfect for folks like Lin Wood that can peddle anything they want and then turn around and say "Well, it's not a verified account of mine" and shills can prop up accounts like the McInerney one and claim it's real by saying "Heh… Plausible deniability". Having said that, I do believe it's the real Lin Wood on telegram, while McInerney might know about the telegram account, but is choosing to not do anything about it because "moves and countermoves".

 

Clarification would be nice. Good luck getting any.

Anonymous ID: fc2614 Feb. 23, 2021, 8:43 a.m. No.13031442   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13031416

>I don't NEED to provide jack shit to prove that MNR/COMMS are Gatekeepers as I prove that shit every damn day.

You put emotional dribble where your proofs needed to go. I'll give you one more post to prove it.

Anonymous ID: fc2614 Feb. 23, 2021, 8:46 a.m. No.13031471   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13031373

>Bad enough that GV's have more power than BO's.

Why don't you invite Jim to come talk about it with anons? Is there some sort of fear that something might be uncovered as a result of the discussion?

Anonymous ID: fc2614 Feb. 23, 2021, 8:50 a.m. No.13031502   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13031453

Anon, I really don't give a fuck. I'm not here to follow a bunch of other people in the direction they think is the best or smartest. I'm here to disseminate the information as it churns through this aggregate (and others), and shit post with anons. Also call out flagrant asshattery, massive faggotry, and occasionally give Q some shit for not going plan z. That's about it.

Anonymous ID: fc2614 Feb. 23, 2021, 8:53 a.m. No.13031528   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1690 >>1767

>>13031506

>>13031420

>>13031470

Yep, see, here we go. You come here, you point out the obvious, and folks make posts like you ain't even in the fucking room. All this "follow this person, or that person" on an unverified platform nonsense. I'll believe that's his account when he makes a statement saying it's his account. Until then, it's all unverified chicanery.