>>13039884 (lb)
I don't even see the code anymore. All I see is "One ring to rule them all, and then the darkness binds them."
This isn't really hard, folks. He's got a decent sized pecker, access to money and power, and likes to have a good time. Apparently he's good at making chicks "dick drunk".
/shrug
Yeah, that pretty much confirms OathKeepers as legit. Poor drunk George. Lost all them credibilities back in 2016 after /pol/ ripped him apart.
>are legit then
It's perfectly legal to have a group of like minded patriots get together and defend their property from time to time. That's one of those "constitution" things, methinks.
Right there with you, anon. I would find it highly unusual that folks that simply want continue using federal farm land to allow their cattle to graze, which in turn feeds the entirety of the USA, to be a territz org anytime the Feds get land-grabby and try to kick them off.
I could be waaaay out of left field on this, but that's what that whole fucked up situation seemed to entail to this anon.
I'm OK with symbols and allegory to teach life lessons, but presupposing an historical context with minimal secular supporting documentation or other proof outside of Gospels written 40+ years after the fact is as aggravating as trying to even approach that conversation with your average Christian. They plug their ears and yell "kumbaya" while attempting to have a serious discussion about Josephus' role in the Flavian Rome, and especially the very early beginnings of what would become known as "The Church".
She got lucky she didn't get Charlie Sheen's AIDS. Really lucky.
You're right; sorry. Ashlynn Brooke
The fact people are coming after his law license is more telling than anything else. Anyone could shit post anything they want about anybody and unless you have to cha-ching to hire someone that actually good at defamation law like Lin Wood, you aren't going to get anything out of pursuing it, which is why it's not worth it and usually gets ignored. It's just shit flinging.
What Lin appears to be doing, though, is putting a gigantic target on his back and waiting for DS reactions. By the mere mention of these "people" in GA wanting to take Lin's license, they stupidly exposed themselves. So now, you get to see just how deep and wide the corruption is in the legal system itself.
Makes sense? Took me a while, but I see what Lin's doing, and this shit's brilliant. The question I have is, how's he going to keep his law license? Can lawyers transfer law degrees, or do they have to retake the bar each time? I barely made it out of high school, so I have no clue.
No sir. I deal in redheads only.
Hehe, it's tough right? Sometimes you have to take a walk, get fresh air, then light up, pour some bourbon and just sit in a quiet room with nothing but your thoughts/imagination to see it. Rarely (if ever) works for me, but sometimes I get persistence and opportunity to intersect, and get a real light bulb moment.
You, fren and anon, are watching the wrong movie. Think about it from this perspective (see pic related). There's lots of shit going on, and the shitshow that is DC right now is scrambling for "what to do next". How hard they had to lean on the DC mayor to setup the makeshift prison is fun to wonder about, but it's even more entertaining when you realize she was too stupid to think before making the call. Then the cackling. Then DJT taking the nukes with him. Then Joe making gaffes, and Psaki making an ass of herself. No SOTU. Nothing. Just a bunch of normies starting to get really antsy about this "Joe" thing; knowing he stolded the election. And then it hits them. Sometimes softly at first; others in a panic.
Some of them even slowly turn their heads to you with the look of absolute horror, as you sit stuffing your Q face with your Q popcorn watching them through your Q glasses with the biggest shit-eating grin since The Grinch. They know you know, and that you've also been waiting for this moment for years. But you say nothing. You wait patiently, and lovingly for the moment they conjure up the stones to broach the subject.
Most of them will relent, be angry at you, or exclaim "BULLSHIT!!!!" as they scurry to their internet bolt holes, and start discussing the situation with their comrades. "This can't be happening!", one will say. Another will say "Guys, this Hunter laptop thing… I think it's real, actually". The another will say "Why doesn't Psaki just give straight answers? I'm scared. Hold me!"
As they slam their laptop shut, they begin to question it. All of it.
Who was Josephus before he changed his name?
Did he stay loyal to his people?
Why were the Flavians the first Saints, anon?
Who, exaclty, were the Flavians?
When Rome ransacked the temple, did they take anything with them?
Did psyops exist back then?
There's lots of great wisdom in the stories, and archeology provides some really interesting insights.
Jesus came for the lost sheep of the House of Israel. Where, exactly, did Jesus come from, though? Who, exactly, were the lost sheep? That Samaritan lady; she shewed great faith, didn't she? Apparently death does a real doozy to your outreach ministry when you suddenly decide (after spending 3 days in afterlife limbo taking the keys to Hell and freeing all the OT saints to go directly to heaven) "Alright, guys. Let's take the message to everyone, shall we?" And your disciples are all, like, "You mean, even the Gentiles? yuck". "Yes, my padawans. Even the Gentiles."
So why'd Jesus change his mind? Jesus said he came for the Israelites that were lost sheep. Who were the Israelites Jesus came for? Did Christ consider the Judeans to be Israelites? What does God need with a blood sacrifice? Why did the original church push the idea of transubstantiation so much? Was it because they needed the church to take on some beliefs of other religions? How far back can you date the use of psyops to control the population?
>Even some of our shill/special interest groups are leaking
I saw that, and forgot to save that image. Seemed rather convincing, actually.