why only three? if two is great and three is even better, why not 10 or 100? Maybe we should just get one every day.
believe it or not, you can not take a virus, inject it into a person or animal and infect them. At least that is what they were teaching in immunology in the early 2000s. back then they said they did not really understand how the immune system worked and why they had to add adjuvants to the virus to get an immune reaction. There are those who seem believe the virus is actually just the waste from other cell processes. They believe the entire virus model was a misunderstanding of real research that was going on by media hyped and scientifically challenged Pasture. The paradise was embraced by the medical community and has metastasized to such an extent that society can not step back and reimagine the true causes of illness and disease.
ok but putting a virus in your blood stream by it self does nothing.
No doubt, but the majority of the current medical professionals have that teaching as their foundational understanding of how the immune system works.
If you have research that actually shows how the virus causes the problem as opposed to being present when a problem occurs, I am all ears.
but then putting the pure virus in directly into your system should result in the virus injecting into the cell and the disease process starting. all the research I have seen says that does not happen.
I do not purport to know how the immune system works, I just have listened to people who have studied it, people who believe the current narrative and those who believe the current narrative is flawed. The basic problem with a virus by itself not having the expected response in the body looks to me like reality bumping up against belief. If the very foundational underpinning of the virus model fails in the real world (i.e. the virus being able to infect the cells on its own), you will never be able to find and correct the root cause of the illness.
>wikipedia
?
consensus driven thinking leads to lowest common denominator outcomes, not necessarily the truth.
>medical dictionary
The very paradigm that is being under discussion. If Pasteur was wrong, everything built on top of the model comes into question. Maybe that is why there never really is a cure, just a never ending problem that a massive industry has been built on.