>baker has no choice but to use the fucking spam bot's news
Baker, you are under no obligation to include newsbots posts. If all it is is a headline and offsite ink "real anons" are not going to complain if it's not included. Baker should be comfortable ignoring screaming faggots and not even deign to reply to their faggotry.
And baker most certainly should not feel obliged to respond to this anon's opining.
Over and out.
>give me something to fill the buns with otherwise we have no notables.
Anon has scraped (pb)s for bakers previously and anon is not the least bit fazed if I only collect a handful; quality over quantity is ok for this anon.
If baker feels an unsauced story is important, then a polite request for anons to fetch would not go astray. Something like this, perhaps.
Baker feels this story is important, but won't notable without sauce. Could a kind anon sauce it for baker?
Again, just anon's 02c's worth.
Damn, anon didn't realise bracelets were a sign from God confirming our God given rights.