Prince Harry is 'way more comfortable' with 'The Crown' than he is with the media

James Corden took his buddy Prince Harry on a sightseeing tour around Los Angeles on The Late Late Show Thursday night, where Harry shared his thoughts on Netflix's award-winning series The Crown.

"They don't pretend to be news, it's fictional. But it's loosely based on the truth," Harry explained to Corden. "Of course it's not strictly accurate. But loosely, it gives you a rough idea about what that lifestyle, what the pressures of putting duty and service above family and everything else, what can come from that."

On January 8, 2020, Harry and Meghan Markle shocked the world, when they announced they were stepping away from their royal family roles, following months of speaking out on the intense media scrutiny they've faced. During his discussion with Corden Thursday, Harry admitted that he prefers the fictionalized version of his world over the media's version.

Harry stated, "I am way more comfortable with The Crown than I am seeing the stories written about my family, or my wife, or myself, because it's the difference between – that is obviously fiction, take it how you will, but this is being reported on as fact because you are supposedly news. I have a real issue with that."

While Harry has made it clear that "it was never walking away, it was stepping back rather than stepping down," he shared why it was a necessary move, as he told Corden, "You know, it was a really difficult environment, as I think a lot of people saw. We all know what the British press can be like, and it was destroying my mental health. I was, like, 'this is toxic.' So I did what any husband and what any father would do is, like, I need to get my family out of here. But we never walked away. And as far as I'm concerned, whatever decisions are made on that side, I will never walk away. I will always be contributing, but my life is public service, wherever I am in the world, it is going to be the same thing."

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/prince-harry-way-more-comfortable-with-the-crown-than-with-media-090020023.html

>>13052486

825 & 827 Q drops 3 yr deltas.

SEC_Test &

Stanislav Lunev.

The BRIDGE.

Payback for today.

Q

Weaponized Eff Bee Eye. Pic related. Wanted reference to pic number 236.

Q 236

Focus on Hussein.

Revelations coming very very soon.

HUMA - SA - Hussein.

HLR (first).

Civil rights attorney.

13th District - Sen.

DNC.

Hussein v HRC v McCain.

Why is this relevant?

Follow the money pre-pres.

Follow the connections pre-pres.

Why does Hussein travel ahead of POTUS?

Why did Hussein travel behind POTUS?

Think Asia.

Think NK.

What was told re: NK during the past 8 years?

What dramatic shift occurred re: NK post election of POTUS?

Reconcile.

Define hostage.

The Sum of all Fears.

Why are sexual harassment claims all appearing suddenly?

Coincidence?

What is a pill?

When is it hard to swallow?

How do you remove your enemies from positions of influence and authority?

Define stages.

Define puppets.

Define puppet handlers.

Define proxy war.

Define proxy war.

Define proxy war.

Expand your thinking.

Why is Justice stalling release of c-level info?

Think.

Does POTUS control all matters classified?

Think.

Have faith.

These people are losers!

Q

>>13052638

Not sure why they're not just calling it what it is. CHILD ABUSE.

Legislation for the Mutilation of a Child.

God's Creation is Perfect. God didn't make mistakes. Human Ego/Override believes it can alter that.

>>13052695

More than Jewish. Sacrifices are long rooted in Satanic rituals.

“Just a Snip”?: A Social History of Male Circumcision

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1016/S0968-8080%2807%2929303-6#:~:text=Certainly%2C%20the%20practice%20of%20male,God%20dating%20back%20to%20Abraham.

UK Supreme Court rejects IS bride's legal bid to return

Britain's highest court on Friday rejected a bid by a woman who was stripped of her UK citizenship for joining the Islamic State group to return to challenge the decision.

Five judges at the Supreme Court gave a unanimous decision in the case of Shamima Begum, whose legal battles have come to be seen as a test of how Britain treat nationals who joined the jihadists.

They found her right to a fair hearing did not override considerations such as public safety, and that the decision to block her return should remain until she can participate "without the safety of the public being compromised".

"That is not a perfect solution, as it is not known how long it may be before that is possible," the head of the Supreme Court, judge Robert Reed, said in a written judgment.

"But there is no perfect solution to a dilemma of the present kind."

Prime Minister Boris Johnson's spokesman said the government was pleased with the ruling, telling reporters "decisions to deprive individuals of their citizenship are not taken lightly".

"The safety and security of the UK must come first," he added.

Now 21, Begum left her home in east London at the age of 15 to travel to Syria with two school friends and married an IS fighter.

Britain's then-interior minister Sajid Javid revoked her citizenship in 2019 on national security grounds amid an outcry led by right-wing newspapers.

• 'Extreme actions' -

The Conservative lawmaker welcomed Friday's verdict, noting it underlined that the government must be able to decide if someone poses too serious a threat to enter the country.

"Any restrictions of rights and freedoms faced by this individual are a direct consequence of the extreme actions that she and others have taken," Javid added.

In 2019 Begum told The Times newspaper that she did not regret travelling to Syria and had not been "fazed" by seeing a severed head dumped in a bin.

Although Britain has blocked her return, the United States and several European countries have accepted the repatriation of their citizens accused of joining the IS group overseas, with some facing charges in their home countries.

Begum claims she married a Dutch convert soon after arriving in IS-held territory. She was discovered, nine months pregnant, in a Syrian refugee camp in February 2019.

She remains in a camp in poor conditions, while her husband is reportedly in jail in Syria.

Her newborn baby died soon after she gave birth, while her two other children also died in infancy under IS rule.

Begum has repeatedly appealed various court rulings over her ability to re-enter Britain to challenge the legality of losing her citizenship.

• 'Dangerous precedent' -

Begum argued that the decision was unlawful as it has made her stateless and exposed her to the risk of death or inhuman and degrading treatment.

Begum is of Bangladeshi heritage but the country's foreign minister has said he will not consider granting her citizenship.

The Court of Appeal ruled in July last year that Begum needed to come back to mount a fair and effective appeal.

But the interior ministry in turn appealed against this decision, insisting she remained "aligned" with the proscribed terrorist organisation.

A government lawyer told the Supreme Court in November her return would create "an increased risk of terrorism".

more

https://www.yahoo.com/news/uk-supreme-court-rejects-brides-101914548.html