Eric Schmidt Warns Congress: “Chinese Leadership in Key Technology Areas is a National Crisis”
https://lincolnpolicy.org/2021/eric-schmidt-warns-congress-chinese-leadership-in-key-technology-areas-is-a-national-crisis/
The former Google CEO and current chair of the National Security Commission on Artificial
Intelligence offered a sobering message to Congress about China’s technology strategy.
Pretty usual china rhetoric, except this other take at it from NTD
China in Focus, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RaQ2ZBqr_s at about 5:53 mark
TSMC (semi-cons) is one of US's leading VITAL/KEY suppliers, based in Taiwan (though factories all over)
NTD's take is: if … no WHEN china takes over Taiwan these KEY STRATEGIC suppliers fall into china's hands.
(Note: Trump starting in 2019 was asking TSMC to move [more / as much as possible] to US.
… bidum's already killed any chances of that.)
bidum's china approach
'We will warn them, but china will do what china will do for china
… and being soverign to themselves we CANT stop them or make them change.'
(OK, that's my paraphrasing)
Yes bidum's happy to start "wars" in Iran/Syria … (lesser shithole countries)
-
CIA pretty much has to arm and finance these 'dangerous enemies' to make that possible
-
it'll never move to or near a US theater - always gonna be the other side of the world (safe)
(did "they" really do 9/11 or being so useless even after arming and
funding them did the CIA still have to do most it for them?)
china: is a far different proposition
-
for sure it'll be minimum a pacific theater,
and let's not forget Canada's cozy china training setups, ships/subs off the East coast?
-
china's armed forces individually be crap vs US but theirs MILLIONS of them
-
bidum's "china will do what…' shows UNWILLINGNESS to want to ever engage…
"too hard, too dangerous, too big" : excuses in advance
… let china take TW with no more than "strong statements"
… once china takes TW (key strategic suppliers) US will HAVE to trade ON THEIR terms
(or is there something else in it for Bidum? […via extended family.])