>>>13065831 lb
>Maybe there was something else in that amendment. Or something else occured… CFR…some agreement.
>They say it was to shorten the lame duck time after the election. But why was it March 4th to begin with? Was that the date of the United States of America NOT USCORP and that whole takeover is fraudulent therefore they reverted to that original date?
>Maybe some wise ones could fly in a direction to follow?
Would all of that have to do with the way pence read the paragraph before each group of Electors? The Verbiage was changed from all readings of prior readings in past Elections.
LegalBabble?