Anonymous ID: fab348 Feb. 28, 2021, 3:43 a.m. No.13067786   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7791 >>7820 >>8215

>>13067761

>Are Patriots still in control?

What do you think?

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/01/28/ghislaine-maxwell-asked-room-full-underage-girls-dance-epstein/

Ghislaine Maxwell asked 'room full of underage girls' to dance for Epstein, unsealed court papers alleged

Hundreds of new legal documents have been publicly released in the US, including how Ms Maxwell allegedly procured young girls for Epstein

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/492411173/Maxwell-July2016depo

 

If Bidan was actually in control (and was Biden), this place would be shut down already, and Epstein/Maxwell would not be in the news anymore.

Anonymous ID: fab348 Feb. 28, 2021, 3:47 a.m. No.13067803   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7815

>>13067770

>please point moi in the direction Judy Wood is a liarโ€ฆ

Just get her book and read it.

Or watch the video of hers where she is literally laughing and cheering when the towers collapse because muh energy.

 

If she is actually truthful with her space beam laser theory, she is still a crazy bitch.

 

She looks to me like a cointelpro plant, making fun of 9/11.

Anonymous ID: fab348 Feb. 28, 2021, 3:50 a.m. No.13067820   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8215

>>13067786

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article248775630.html

 

Even as Ghislaine Maxwell documents are unsealed, many of her secrets remain buried

 

In July 2016, lawyer David Boies forced Ghislaine Maxwell to sit for a sworn deposition in New York as part of a civil defamation lawsuit that had grown increasingly contentious in the year since it was filed.

 

Maxwell, who was accused of helping financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually exploit and rape countless girls, had managed to evade subpoenas and, in a prior deposition, was so combative that she refused to answer even the simplest of questions. The federal judge overseeing the case ordered her to sit for another round of questions, this time in front of Boies, one of the countryโ€™s most formidable attorneys.

 

The questioning promised to be more direct and explicit, forcing Maxwell to discuss her sex life, particularly with Epstein. This line of questioning by Boies was part of an effort to show how the couple weaponized their sexual proclivities to pressure young victims to participate in deviant behavior with them and others.

 

Boies, and his partner, Sigrid McCawley, were representing Virginia Giuffre, who alleged that Maxwell and Epstein had sexually abused her when she was underage. She also claimed that they instructed her how to pleasure a number of their friends in the same way that they taught her to perform for them.

 

โ€œThis was to show the nature of her relationship with Epstein, and the kind of sexual conduct that they were orchestrating,โ€™โ€™ Boies explained.

โ€ฆ

The earlier appeals court ruling permitted the unsealing of documents that contained the names of powerful men that Giuffre accused of abuse, but Preska is now redacting all those names previously made public, including Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz and others.

 

The 73-page transcript of the July 2016 deposition reflects testimony Maxwell was forced to give after an earlier judge determined that she had been evasive in an April 2016 deposition when asked the same questions..

 

Included in the dozens of documents released late Wednesday are excerpts from testimony given by Epsteinโ€™s former house manager Juan Alessi; and by Rinaldo Rizzo, a houseman employed by billionaire hedge fund mogul Glenn Dubin, a friend of Epsteinโ€™s. Dubin, whom Giuffre has also accused of sexual abuse, was issued a subpoena last year by Denise George, the attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands, who is bringing a civil racketeering case against the Epstein estate. Dubin has denied Giuffreโ€™s allegations.

โ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: fab348 Feb. 28, 2021, 3:55 a.m. No.13067835   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7847

>>13067815

She is literally putting all sorts of crazy shit in her works, and it's not funny-autistic-fun shit, but really crazy shit.

Why the fuck would you trust that bitch?

Who the fuck is supposed to take someone like her seriously?

>DEW

Give me actual proofs of that even existing.

You can't.

>but but but these photos here

Does not prove these to exist.

Anonymous ID: fab348 Feb. 28, 2021, 3:58 a.m. No.13067841   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7846

>>13067832

>If so they are drone controlled missiles

Or nothing at all, and a pure MSM hoax, similar to COVID.

It's OBVIOUS that MSM modified the footage.

 

Buildings went down because controlled demolition, which means they were prepared in advance, which also means that planes, missiles or whatever was not needed in the first place and would have been a massive risk. What they used specifically for the controlled demo is not even relevant.

Anonymous ID: fab348 Feb. 28, 2021, 4 a.m. No.13067849   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7882

>>13067843

>what if it was project blue beam

Why though?

Eye witnesses in NY reported in live footage no planes, but bombs, explosions.

There also were actors on the ground.

Why?

 

99.9% of the world who "witnissed" 9/11 watched video of MSM, which was without any doubt modified in at least some way.

They were watching a movie. Literally.

Anonymous ID: fab348 Feb. 28, 2021, 4:08 a.m. No.13067877   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7881 >>7883 >>7892

>>13067865

>You don't need nano thermite for 9-11 to happen.

Right.

The physics reveal that it was a controlled demolition.

That's all there is to it. They don't need magic new technology for it. Maybe it was, but there is no proof of that existing, which means believing in some retarded theory makes no sense, especially when the one telling it adds all sorts of SICK SHIT everywhere, kinda like sucking retards in to then "debunk" them, showing the retarded shit.

 

Point is controlled demolition, prepared, which means the whole MSM narrative falls apart.

That's all that actually matters.

Anonymous ID: fab348 Feb. 28, 2021, 4:37 a.m. No.13067978   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8076

>>13067942

>How do you account for the people, the passengers on those planes that died?

At least for one I'm pretty sure that it was on the ground when the people on board called their relatives, because back then doing so was impossible especially for minute-long calls without any interruptions.

 

People interviewed even state that the calls were crystal clear, without interruptions and at least a few state explicitly that they were called from private phones, which again was impossible back then from that height.

 

At least one stewardess also didn't act according to their flight-got-taken-over protocol, which makes it even more fishy.

 

This means at least that one (probably all) were taken out. Maybe they landed at a military base. You can guess what they did to the real people afterwards.

 

I'm not even sure if all planes really existed in the first place. To my knowledge boarding videos/photos of the terrorists/patsies were not released to the public, probably do not even exist.

 

And of course all of that could even be 100% bullshit, all actors. I can't check that myself of course. If there were real people involved, right now I think the plane(s) was/were taken over and landed prior to the calls.