Anonymous ID: 254ba5 Feb. 28, 2021, 2:46 p.m. No.13073008   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3022

>>13072611 (/lb)

>Notice how you don't respond to the point made

 

Notice responses are taking place to 'points', just not the one you want to be 'the' narrative to debate, consider, BELEIVE IS A RELEVANT 'CHOICE'…get distracted…BY DESIGN.

 

When the 'point' you raise is intended to attack Q and deflect from 'points' being made…in favor of pretending your narrative is the 'starting point' for any and all 'talk'…

 

The telltale sign of shilling is to present a set of statements in response to Q drop syntax, and demand an illogical 'disproof' requirement that was never meant to end or be resolved because the interactive game was rigged from the start.

 

You didn't respond to Anon's 'points', why should yours?

Anonymous ID: 254ba5 Feb. 28, 2021, 2:54 p.m. No.13073214   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13073135

It would be convenient for 'the worst' to have the world believe the division of religion scripts are solely originating within religions and not externally driven by deliberate multi-generational psychological warfare would allow us to parse out of even 'anon' boards?

Anonymous ID: 254ba5 Feb. 28, 2021, 3:10 p.m. No.13073538   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3573

>>13073184

Definition of insanity is doing the same thing as you are, over and over again, and expecting a different result.

Look at you attacking Q syntax without my asking you to do so.

Q has you.

You're not here talking about anything other than attacking posts with Q drop syntax.

 

Do you know what a self-sustaining reality of winning by merely revealing the internal inconsistencies of anything that attacks it, really means?

 

Where are your sources in the Q drops that suggests anything you wrote is true?

 

You just listed a random bunch of years and dates crossed out.

 

Those years and dates have forever truths associated with them, but you never made any content available by those dates, so, I could just as easily and exactly logically true as what you think makes you correct by virtue of posting that list, then…

 

~~2017~~

 

~~2018

 

~~2019

 

~~2020

 

~~November 3rd

 

~~December 25th

 

~~January 6th

 

~~January 19th

 

~~January 21st

 

~~Febuary 9th

 

~~Feb. 19th~~

 

This list according to what you're posting makes this list favor me and prove you trusted the wrong 'source'.

 

Look at you panic over a 'larp' who hasn't posted since dec.

 

When Q dropped 'all for a 'larp''…you didn't really believe it was only referring to CURRENT events for the time period those drops were posted…

 

What lunatic would be spending their time attacking Anons who post words that statistically occur in 'larp' drops that have been silent since last year?

 

We're not locked in here with you, you are locked in here with us….if that's how you think it all 'ends'…power game of ideological 'dominance' to the point of sounding like you, a psychotic prison guard attempting to psychologically torture ANONYMOUS DIGITAL BITS…

 

Good luck! (going to need it)