why attack immigrants when “ x ” are the issue? invade the cities, take the cities, battle in the streets for the cities. drive them from your lands and give the traitors what traitors deserve: a traitors death. to lose our lands, our culture and our people is a defeat. weak men have created this situation and strong men are needed to fix it. cheap labour is slave labour, refuse to import modern slaves a boil over in the melting pot civil war in the so called “ melting pot ” that is the united states should be a major aim in overthrowing the global power structure and the wests ’ egalitarian, individualist, globalist dominant culture. it is due to a lack of will. unsurprisingly ethno-nationalists and nationalists seek employment in areas that serve their nations and community. if we wait until the majority of the boomers begin to pass (between 2028-2038 depending on individual nations and life expectancies) than it will be too little, too late. fertility rates are cultural, there is no denying that, so there was a war of cultures being fought by the invaders, and my attack was a response to this. this is ethnic replacement.

both would seek to destroy our nation, both would seek to displace and replace our people, both would seek to destroy our culture and nationhood. young, innocent and dead ebba. the final push was witnessing the state of french cities and towns. we do not have the birth rates to fight them at their game, nor should we as it is ultimately destructive to nature and culture.so i took matters into my own hands. i do not just expected to be released, but i also expect an eventual nobel peace prize.as was awarded to the terrorist nelson mandela once his own people achieved victory and took power. do you consider yourself a leader?

>what nations do we have to conserve?