the risk is too great. depending on the definition. why did you choose this time to attack? no, there isn ’ t a successful, influential grand movement established just yet, and no leading organizations, so there is no great structure created that could be brought to harm. a finger on the hand of the body of europe. when you see them; when you hear them; you will know them, as they are you, and yours. just as their own courage will never flower forth. haplogroups, phenotypes and globalized testing. more recently i have been working part time as a kebab removalist. each time she spoke i was stunned by her insights and her own views helped push me further and further into the belief of violence over meekness. i could have chosen any weapons or means.a tatp filled rental van.
is there a particular person that radicalized you the most? it should come as no shock that european men, in every nation, and on every continent are turning to radical notions and methods to combat the social and moral decay of their nations and the continued ethnic replacement of their people. if we want to radically and fundamentally change society, then we need to radicalize society as much as possible. also, relying on this time period for our victory holds a second major disadvantage, that being vulnerability to foreign invasion, most likely from the east, specifically china; turkey; india or some combination of the three. but the unarmed invader, we have no real idea on how to deal with them, we are unable to attack them or fend them off in any meaningful way. fertility rates are cultural, there is no denying that, so there was a war of cultures being fought by the invaders, and my attack was a response to this.