so no, i don ’ t believe so. no, carrying out an attack for fame would be laughable.after all who can remember the name of the attackers in the september 11 attack in new york? how about the attack on the pentagon? depending on the definition, sure. did you really expect they would not also lose their rights? but no one ever seems to give a reason why. rage, rage against the dying of the light. to take revenge for the enslavement of millions of europeans taken from their lands by the islamic slavers. humans are emotional, they are driven by emotions, guided by emotions and seek emotion expressions and experiences. i want you in my sights. a vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change. flee to your own lands, while you still have the chance section ii general thoughts and potential strategies ``it will come in one way and one way alone, not through existing governments.
sure. no. this eradication of their people, their culture, their very soul. that was during a triumphant victory. but kill sixty unarmed invaders having shown the will and the intent to bring harm to your nation and people, and you will be considered a monster, dragged through the streets, ridiculed, attacked, your character assassinated in every way it can be and finally tried in court and imprisoned for the rest of your life. originally the mosque in dunedin was the main target, particularly after watching the video on their facebook page named “ otago muslim association ” https: //www.facebook.com/otago-muslim-association-20677822935878 6/ the video war entitled “ very interesting video.
>in the fell clutch of circumstance i have not winced nor cried aloud.