a vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change. no matter where i travelled, no matter how small or rural the community i visited, the invaders were there. the storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. that perverse nation profanes the hospices … the temple of the lord is treated like a criminal and the ornaments of the sanctuary are robbed. everything else is just a catchphrase. you're fucking dead, kid. the second event was the 2017 french general election. there are cultural, ethnic and racial differences that makes interchanging one ethnic group with another an impossibility. what makes you believe you can speak for a group? why them when i could do it myself? continued immigration into europe is environmental warfare and ultimately destructive to nature itself.

answering possible questions 1.in general who are you? that is complicated. also, relying on this time period for our victory holds a second major disadvantage, that being vulnerability to foreign invasion, most likely from the east, specifically china; turkey; india or some combination of the three. what can we do to fix it? were/are you a supporter of donald trump? in the united states, perhaps more than anywhere else in the world, the cult of the individual has been practiced for the longest time and with the deepest devotion.